Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4155)	7/24/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

I agree but also therr are those that naysay will twisting innuendoes. Grrrr! Malious intent! Grrr Grrrrr. Look on the MIDL thread .. There is a decade old scenario been drugged up by certain naysayers post a bunch of crock with out one shread of facts. I have followed your posts and naysays. I have to admit you are not like some of these low life characters that use sly negative tactics. Character assassinations I am sick of on the internet. Big Dog posted here he was changing to doing more DD than Hype ... well he may not be the best presentator and his posts can be considered hype but I am not going to accuse him of wrong doing nor of front loading because he is posting DD instead of buy this is going to rocket . If he likes a stock and loads up on it that is his right. Boob I think is an honorable and the same way applies. Now because I dislike the tactics of TMex with him making me an offer to shut up to get his inside picks before he brings them to the internet. I view him entirely different for I have no respect for the man. The men of Midland fighting to get Midland shareholders back what was took are now being assassinated on line. There is a fine line between facts and solid anaylical thinking of naysaying and being obviously transparent with it. I have not gone over there to see what is happening since I try to stay to my stocks. If everyone liked the same stocks then there would be no liquidity in the market. Obvious facts and DD is what I look for in a naysayer just like I look for facts in a DDer on the positive side. Give me the proof or have it posted somewhere on line. This is why I like summary pages which has the key points of interest to stocks. Every single one of these OTC can be nailed by a fact finding naysayer. Just sometimes the naysays have no merit in their posts. After reading yours I do not see where you are of this particular naysay since most of yours can be supported. One of the reasons I never said anything to you in the 3 months I have been aware of your reputation. People should always question a negative poster the same as a positive poster... verify. Poor naysaying is dragging up things from the past that have no merit on the stock current. Good naysaying is doing as much DD as investors do. I do agree that blaming SI is a crock also. Just like blaming someone else for your loss. It will all work out sooner or later. However I do believe a lot of naysayers are warriors for the undesireables. I judge each naysay individually and do not make comparisons same as I do the positive posters. Not like it is not all over the SEC, and everywhere to use common sense and do a little homework. Of course if they loose money that does not matter that general warnings have been stuffed in their faces of a long time. Be like smoking losing a lung and wanting to blame someone for you lighting up one time after time. Hey I could be wrong. GB