Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: killybegs who wrote (3050)	7/24/1998 7:13:00 PM
From: Hal Campbell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17679

While I of course do not know if that is the case, Jubimer, it is consistent with a hire AXC made a few months ago. The job offer specifically cited sputtering a thin film to magnetic heads. The most effective way AXC could ever license any patent is to first use it successfully themselves.

To: killybegs who wrote (3050)	7/24/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: Ms. Blumkin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17679

The tax liability carry forward language from the 10Q basically means that since they changed alot of the ownership based on the preferred stock deals the NOLs will expire partially worthless ... the laws on use of NOLs is complex, but they work to preserve the benefits so long as the owners who experienced the losses are the owners who will get the benefit of the NOLs harboring future tax payments ... any significant ownership changes means less NOLs available ... not all that important today, though a $100MM NOL is a valuable asset if you could use a big piece of it ... Can someone tell me the best place to find patents that AXC is filing? Thanks in advance.