Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Fonar - Where is it going? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WebDrone who wrote (10549)	7/24/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: Kenneth E. De Paul	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19354

I agree with your analogy, however, I feel there just isn't enough market out there for Fonar to build up like it has with all its suit winnings and make it. That is my concern. I am watching to see how the next two quarters show for Fonar, and we will see if they can get it together. Also, we will see if the purchase departments of hospitals, PPM's, etc. are willing to buy anything of theirs. Should be very interesting, wouldn't you agree?

To: WebDrone who wrote (10549)	7/26/1998 12:15:00 AM
From: James L. Fleckenstein	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 19354

Call me "picky" but ... it would be nice if somebody proof read the website pages before putting them on line. One of the best MRIs, year after year, is the Phillips product line. BUT! Their documentation (operating manuals) and marketing brochures have always been embarrassing for the number of English usage errors etc. Granted they are a dutch company and English is not their first language....BUT! "if you are this careless with your marketing, why should your engineering be any better"? So as I look at the latest website and see "sophisticated" misspelled and the MRI of the brain image under MAO upside down, I gotta wonder: Who is watching the store? How many spelling errors you think are on the GE website? (hint: none, never) I mean, can't they afford a spell checker on their word processing program? Now, who is responsible the PR firm or the Fonar firm. If this is the work of the PR firm, I would fire them on the first ...maybe second misspelling. Then again I a might be a little more compulsive than others. I am glad to see the website improved. They added a few more images to the image section too but they are still only T1-weighted in high resolution. The low resolution T2s really should go until they have something to brag about. Maybe for my article, I will show a picture of one our images and compare it to the one on the website...after all that is presumably their best work right?