Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Learning To Invest Correctly - A Shared Experience -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nazbuster who wrote (19)	7/24/1998 8:16:00 PM
From: Druss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 253

Daniel--That may be an effective way to address the problem. Can I ask the name of the book? My experience with TA (Candlesticks mostly) has been that the deeper one gets into it the more difficult to interpret it is and the less accurate it seems to be. However the simple basic moves are easy to interpret and valid. All the Best Druss

To: Nazbuster who wrote (19)	7/25/1998 2:36:00 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 253

Daniel, Although I respect anyone's intelligent approach to investing, (instead of throwing darts at a newspaper page of stock listings), I sincerely feel that Fundamental Analysis, F/A, is much more beneficial than Technical Analysis, T/A, in determining where a company's stock price is going, instead of trying to determine by a chart of where it is going based on where it has been. I also believe that any analysis though, is better than none, which is how a lot of people invest. I think that along with F/A, T/A, or whatever, you have to consider what the competition is doing, what the sector is doing, what the broad market is doing, etc. In short, there are no easy answers. Good luck, and have fun, Phil