Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Etec Systems moving up -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry D who wrote (1050)	7/25/1998 8:53:00 AM
From: Carl R.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1279

Devices (memory, cpus, video chips, etc) get more complex all the time, which means more transistors, which means bigger. The bigger the chips, the more important it is to use a large wafer in order to avoid waste. Wafers are round, and chips are square, so there is always a certain amount of waste, but the larger the chips is relative to the wafer, the more the waste. Plus there are handling considerations as well. Where line widths /feature sizes fit in is that by reducing sizes you can make the chips smaller, which reduces the problems listed above. Thus to a certain extent by going to smaller feature sizes you can reduce the need for going to larger wafers. None of this is related to the need for photomasks, only to improving yields of chips. Carl