SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MY OPINION who wrote (50192)7/24/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: s martin  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 55532
 
To: +DADDY BIGS (49302 )
From: +s martin Wednesday, Jul 8 1998 11:41PM ET
Reply # of 50193

Daddy Bigs, In legal offerings the participants are informed about the investment prior to investing and not after the fact. IOW, it is not, "give us your money and we will then tell you what you bought" Do the following terms meet that requirement? If not, you are buying a "pig in poke".

MERGER WITH AN ON GOING BUSINESS
At this time Morgan and Breton has negotiated an agreement with a privately held company subject to RMIL being current and trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.

The company that has agreed to the merger currently is in a business of which Morgan has 30 years experience. It is now in its second year of business with profits more than $500,000 and sales now exceeding $2,000,000, with projected sales for 1998 of $5,000,000.

d. Company will agree to a stockholders meeting 30 days from the resumption of
trading.

h. At the stockholder meeting the Company will introduce the new acquisitioned
company and will be open for discussions.



To: MY OPINION who wrote (50192)7/25/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
>>> TopCat said "no" i believe.<<<

Daddy, how soon you conveniently forget when it serves your purpose. In fact I answered that I did have some experience outside the US. You asked which country and I responded in some depth in a PM. You thanked me. Technically, you are right, I didn't specifically check but that's not the message you were trying to send here, was it?

TC



To: MY OPINION who wrote (50192)7/25/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Respond to of 55532
 
Daddy, If I had the facts about the new "offerings" I would be happy to comment on the offering, where can I find the facts? Are the facts in the letter that was posted about two three weeks ago?

Zeev