Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5086)	7/25/1998 2:37:00 AM
From: wasp	Respond to of 8879

my apologies actually ive been in since right before the last run up to 36.cents when i bought at 24.and i was a trial member before anyhow i needed to register because of a lost password.so i gues ive been in about 3 or 4 weeks maybe.i was gonna buy too the next day after that post but i was kinda suprised the bid wasnt even up the next morning so i didnt.although my last post was very negative and i did sell flat you missed my point.the point is its a total gamble right now.if the contract comes in and is legit you guys got an easy double.if not this stock goes to a dime.anyway patience is not the point.ive learned alot lately which i didnt know before in the last couple of weeks.like for a hundred bux anyone can post any news ala louis riley. when i say scam look at it like this.for all we know the stock is being totally manipulated.but for all i know i could be wrong.i have never posted something bad on a board after i sold a stock before because if i bought a stock and sold it i still pulled for the other investors.but that only happened like if a company got bad earnings. what gets me here is if this is some kinda scam its like someone robbing your money at gunpoint.thing is i didnt lose money.but im totally urked someone could post news like has been posted by this company and never any kinda follow up.my gut is tellin me something is rotten here.the absolute truth is i hope real numbers on a deal come out so you guys make money.if not someone probably knows when all this news has been comin out and selling then buying and knowing when the next news comes out then selling.or someone knows and just telling there best friend.you get my drift.this is in no way any kinda accusation all im saying is something like that could be possible if shady characters are involved.

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5086)	7/25/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Jim TenIron	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

Hey T.G.W. isn't that great!! Starnet is making it happen despite the Kyl bill. And so will GLOW. Lets just run some numbers real quick. Lets say we were lucky and picked up 10000 shares of Starnet @ .50 (the 52 week low). Cost = $5000.00. Now lets say we sold at $1.50 (not the 52 week high but very reasonable) for $15000.00 and made a profit minus commissions of $10000.00. Not too shabby. Now, we have GLOW. Same industry. We buy 10000 shares at the close of .032 on Friday for $320.00 (lunch money for some) and sell at the same $1.50. That gives us a $14680.00 profit minus commissions. And the monetary risk is much less! Now, I like both companies, as well as some others. And, my IRA is real safe and steady. But as I said before, I like to speculate, remember? You obviously don't. Some people don't have the stomach for these types of investments. The example above is only for demonstration only. But, the fact is, for very little money, the upside is very good. Hell, I spend that on a weekend fishing. And believe me, my fish runs about $150.00/lb., and that's on a good weekend. But, the enjoyment is there. Betcha never thought of it like that, huh? Same kinda thing here. It's fun.

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5086)	7/25/1998 5:18:00 PM
From: BigRedMan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8879

T.G.W., my fine feathered friend. Good to see you again. You said... No competition? I don't understand your question. The word "competition" isn't in my previous post. And did you notice that the GLOw beta site is only in english? Really?? Gee, I didn't notice? Of course, I only know a few english words, I thought all those other words I didn't know were Chinese. And they are not going to do business in the USA? Uh...news flash, T.G.W. The United States is not the only country to speak english! Everyone in the rest of the world does not speak english! That is not a true statement! (For those that are keeping score, it is now 36-0! This is looking like the 1996 Fiesta Bowl - sorry to you Florida Gator fans out there!) I categorically deny the assertion that everyone outside of the United States doesn't speak english. Au contraire, my fine feathered. English is the world's 2nd most prevalent language (right behind Mandarin Chinese). Half a billion people speak English worldwide! sil.org STARNET ANNOUNCES FOUR NEW INTERNET GAMING LICENSEES I'm happy for STARNET and its stockholders. However, if I were an independent operator, I would absolutely positively use GLOW's software over STARNET. (And NOT just because I'm a GLOW stockholder!) "Why?" you ask. Because STARNET requires the client to be downloaded...GLOW's client comes with your browser. GLOW's client is thin so upgrades are performed at the server. STARNET requires that a new client patch or version be downloaded and installed everytime there is an upgrade. In other words, given 20 casinos and 10,000 customers, GLOW performs an upgrade at 20 sites, STARNET performs it as 10,020 sites. Robwin, in case you haven't noticed Red Big and Big whatever know everything about nothing. I may know everything about nothing, but I DO know a heckuva lot more about our legislative process than Robin (sorry, Robin, for some reason, the "W" key on my keyboard doesn't work). Bills that are submitted to the president for signing must first be approved by both sides of the house in identical form. This is one of the basics of our democracy. For a full discussion of how laws are made... thomas.loc.gov For a discussion of bills originating in the senate... thomas.loc.gov "When the Senate passes a bill that originated in the Senate, it is sent to the House for consideration." Now, I have provided clear evidence that totally refutes what you and Robin have been maintaining. If you want to take your civic lessons from an uninformed Canadian (not that an uninformed American would be any better - i.e. TGW), then be my guest. I, however, choose to stick with the facts, ma'am, just the facts! Anything that you say will be responded to in some oblique manner. I know...I was so "oblique" with my references and discussion of the legislative process. Can't discuss the truth so its the only thing they can do. I know! I can't discuss the truth...instead, I waste my time citing facts and providing evidence to back up my assertions. I'm so deceitful that way! PS: Big red whatever will be history after 8/6/98. Are you counting the days?? He will never shell out the money to legitimately post. Hey! I am NOT an illegitimate poster!!! My mom and dad were married!!! He simply does not measure up as a dues carrying member of SI. I know! I've been trying to get SI to accept my $200 but they just keep telling me, "sorry, you just don't measure up as a dues carrying member of SI." Can you teach me how, TGW? I really admire you and want to be just like you!! Your All Time Biggest Admirer and Best Bulletin Board Buddy, GO BIG RED!!! P.S. TGW, have you finished researching your response to my point-by-point post? Isn't there ANYTHING you can poke a hole it? After all, it was a four-page post. Can't you find ANYTHING wrong in those four pages?