Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neal Hopper who wrote (12299)	7/25/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: hal jordan	Respond to of 21342

Neal >>In regards to the DLCs, isn't standard practice to feed the cabinets with OC-3? If I am not mistaken , the data through capacity is 45 mb??<< Correct, the DSC Litespan units have OC-3 feeds. OC-3 runs at 155Mb/s. The one problem is OC-3 is expensive, and not all areas can justify a fiber OC-3 feed because of size. Hal

To: Neal Hopper who wrote (12299)	7/25/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

neal-- some are frame relay if memory serves. that was the problem with GTE. what you say is a very real concern, and it is one of the reasons the RBOCs are going after the FCC so they build out the data networks. good luck to all, trey

To: Neal Hopper who wrote (12299)	7/25/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: Joe Griffin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21342

Dug, Bill c. , Hal, Neal... anyone. I keep hearing that THE major technical problem (outide of standards) is the CROSSTALK problem in bundled wire. Let's not fool ourselves. Have most demonstrations and tests run have been under laboratory conditions without the "bundled" environment under ideal conditions? Is it a technical problem? Can it be overcome? Does WSTL have a solution? Would this prevent ASDL from being implemented? Is this the purpose of the filter described below: americasnetwork.com