SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JKNF who wrote (5787)7/25/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 7966
 
JKNF as we all can see aca is very quiet no volume no price movement with nr very close i myself don't expect the results to be what the market wants i also think it will be next year before the market takes notice again



To: JKNF who wrote (5787)7/26/1998 12:13:00 AM
From: DIAMOND JIM  Respond to of 7966
 
John lots of folks are asking the same questions..and I think the market will watch the NR here closely. Note the large number of folks in our K91 pool. The two month hiatus has been negative for the stock. Something is brewing..the last three pipes were the first reported. K15 may give us a nice surprise. Any intention to do 500-1000tn sample on K91 plus mbs on K11, K6 and possibly K15 should give us some push. Any multi-carat stones in K91 would also be a BIG help. As Frank has often pointed out, a 10tn/hr plant is NOT planned for a 450tn sample only. I agree new heights may not be reached until the K14 bulk results and subsequent major sampling on any of the higher grade pipes is announced in 1999...about the point new money will be needed. Here's to news early in the week. Regards DJ (PS : AC mayday mayday!)



To: JKNF who wrote (5787)7/26/1998 10:06:00 AM
From: ddl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7966
 
I asked that on K-14c a while back. If memory serves me right, it was broken into 3-10m sections for testing. K14c-1 & 2 were released but I don't recall seing K-14c-3.
That hole had the highest diomand count ever and reason was because they broke thru a large diamond and reduced the "unbroken" count, but that was still great.
How is it possible they ended up with a .2c/ton mini bulk?
That and many others questions can't be answered because ACA does not fully report and explain their PRs.
Are we drilling through various layers of kims, are we close to a carrot, have we drilled a carrot?
I somehow get the feeling we are drilling thru various layers of rich kims and Ashton is taking advantage of this by reporting overall results. I'm sure they are keeping track of the results at various levels, but the mini samples are reported as a whole.
Hopefully, they don't do this on the next larger samples as I feel this will "fudge" the results for the worse, which is probably what they want to afford them to keep a "lid" on this play. - just thinking out loud here - denis



To: JKNF who wrote (5787)7/27/1998 9:10:00 AM
From: Famularo  Respond to of 7966
 
I see Don posted. I have removed the NR I posted.