To: Kory who wrote (6266 ) 7/26/1998 2:25:00 AM From: Skeeter Bug Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8002
>>you better have proof.<< ok. 1. last year gtw said the q went in like a lamb and out like a lion - clearly to say that the next q was going to be much better. it wasn't. if i recall correctly, it was much worse. please point everyone to the information relating to waitte's recinding (sp?) said statement before the eps pre-announcement late in the q? 2. gtw said they would not preannounce one q last year, clearly leading people to believe the q was just fine. NOT! a week or two later they preannounced. they were just kidding ;-) 3. they lost money from operations but gtw said they "made" money. 4. now, this q. the cfo says he feels "comfortable" with estimates a few weeks before they disappoint by a whopping 20%! add to that ted waitte touting gtw's great june q on jim cramer's soap box - no mention of the crappy april and may. hmmmm... then they disappoint big. do you wonder why gtw went from $50-$69? it was on the back of these touts. if they had been telling the TRUTH then THERE IS NO WAY GTW WOULD HAVE GONE SO HIGH. from the sound of your post it seems you did not know they did this... i do admit that i'm speculating on cooking the books. however, gtw has recently joined the ranks of the "one time charge" school of accounting. let's see if they continue to do this with the effect of boosting reported eps above what it should be by writing of millions and millions. i bet they do it again in 12-18 months. go ahead, back SLEAZY management. either that or they do not understand their business. i DO NOT think they are DUMB. i believe the other option is accurate. go ahead, support this type of bs. applaud these types of blatant stock touts and manipulations. it is bad any way you cut it. america is about money. there are two distinct ways to get it as an owner. work hard, focus on improving your business and flat out build it - without stock price obsession. the other is to pimp and tout and manipulate investors. gtw has chosen the latter right now. you can't focus on two things. btw, many, many companies have chosen the latter b/c today's investor lacks a basic ability to think critically and take misleading managements at their word. gtw proved that is VERY, VERY DANGEROUS. AGAIN! ;-) but, that is what you appear to like and defend. may you get more of it. ps - remember, gtw paid big bucks to resolve and allegation they misled customers in their commercials regarding their return policy. be careful when you use terms like "honest" when referring to gtw management or their accountants. you better be able to prove it. otherwise, it is slander to all honest people ;-)