SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (50267)7/26/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: Riley G  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
So tell us GRNO poster child. What is really bothering you? Could it be you and a few other nays are trying to fabricate your lies and slander against the Company (RMIL & TVSI) and myself.

What is the SEC civil complaint filed against you? You claim it was not for Stock Fraud, so what is it? Please enlighten us.

Sure, I was subpoenaed by the SEC in regards to TVSI after it's run up. I believe this happened because of the shorts, and nays repeated calls and complaints to the SEC that they THINK I was a stock promoter for the company and that they (a certain VP broker and his cronies) claimed that I was being paid S8 stock by TVSI. This is happening because I believe that We RMIL shareholders have some very big firm stuck in a very large illegal short in RMIL and they are doing everything to try and silence others and myself. Well it will not work. I imagine the SEC was shocked that I posted my answers to their subpoena on the internet, just a Mork (Admitted Short Seller of RMIL for a min. of 100,000 shares) was stunned that I posted a business wire release in rebuttal to his bogus lawsuit against me.

Your remarks that I am scared are full of it. I have no reason to be scared about anything that I have said or done. Unlike others that we know, I have not been charged in a Federal SEC civil complaint.

Your remarks, and those of S Martin and other nays about the TVSI thing is full of it also. Sure I heard RUMORs about a merger, but you see GRNO poster boy, I would have owned the stock during the run up if I believed the rumors that float around the internet. The fact is I DID NOT own it for several months before the news of a merger. Sure I owned it months before and sold for a slight loss, and I even bought in again at approx .10 area on the way down from .30 cents, and still own shares of TVSI. I am not selling them at these low prices and will burn them before the MM get them!

Keep claiming that I had inside information and someone just might believe your lies and slander.

Signed,
Riley G

PS. If you are not guilty of the SEC charges against you, then sue the SEC for the charges. I would!



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (50267)7/26/1998 6:42:00 PM
From: Ellen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
>> Yeah, funny how people fling unsubstantiated and false information around, isn't it?? <<

>> It "may" be true that they is a civil complaint against me, but it ain't for stock fraud. And to say so is an outright fraud in its own right, as well being slanderous. Consider yourself warned that you should cease and desist in this activity until you produce the substantiation. <<

Umm, "may" be true there is a complaint against you...? Isn't for fraud...? To say so is slander...? Unsubstantiated...?

Talk about denial...geezzz

No one cares a hoot what you have to say and didn't even before the SEC charges against you.

charleston.net

SEC targets Green Oasis

Friday, July 3, 1998

By JOHN P. McDERMOTT
Of The Post and Courier staff

The Securities & Exchange Commission has sued Green Oasis Environmental Inc., the company's president and two other individuals for fraud, alleging they profited by issuing false and misleading information about the Charleston-based oil recycler.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston Wednesday, follows a 15-month investigation of Green Oasis by the SEC, which oversees publicly traded companies. The agency alleged that William D. Carraway, Raymond C. "Bo" O'Brien and Ronald V. Reece pumped up the value of Green Oasis' stock starting in 1996 by touting the company through misleading press releases and Internet messages. During that period, O'Brien and Reece never told other investors about their relationships with Carraway's company, according to the lawsuit.

"As a result of their efforts the price of Green Oasis had risen from less than $2 to nearly $10 per share," the SEC said. Carraway, his wife and O'Brien sold more than $2.3 million of the stock between May 1996 and May 1997, the SEC said. The stock has nearly bottomed out since the probe became public in May 1997, now trading from 25 cents to 50 cents a share.

Green Oasis claims to have developed a mobile refinery that can convert waste oil into a low-grade diesel fuel. The SEC's Internet fraud unit started investigating the company in March 1997. Most of the allegations in the lawsuit center around Carraway, president of Green Oasis, and O'Brien, a longtime investor in the company. SEC attorney Edward Sullivan, who filed the complaint, said the document speaks for itself. Carraway could not be reached. O'Brien said he could not comment because he was unaware of the lawsuit Thursday.

The SEC said O'Brien operated two businesses out of the same office near Chicago - Tecumseh Asset Management Inc., which tracked shares of tiny companies like Green Oasis, and Microcap Consulting & Communications, an investor relations firm. He helped Green Oasis obtain a ticker symbol in March 1996. That same month Green Oasis gave Microcap Consulting 20,000 shares to write and distribute news releases. The day after Green Oasis began trading on the Nasdaq Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, O'Brien issued a "flash-aggressive buy recommendation" for the stock in a report from Tecumseh Asset Management. At the time, the company's prototype refinery "lay disassembled in a field," the SEC said. "When he wrote the recommendation, both O'Brien and Carraway knew that there was no reasonable basis for O'Brien's recommendation," according to the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, Microcap Consulting, now with a sizable stake in Green Oasis, started issuing the first of 31 upbeat press releases on a range of topics, from large purchase orders that never materialized to purported tax breaks. Some of the written statements "created a misleading impression" about Green Oasis "and the likelihood of its success," the SEC said. The news releases "materially misrepresented the status of Green Oasis's technology, its commercial viability as well as the existence of purchase orders for its equipment," the SEC alleged.

Reece, a self-employed, part-time security consultant from Alexandria, Va., was introduced to Green Oasis by O'Brien. The SEC said Carraway and O'Brien encouraged him "to publish positive information about the company in numerous Internet news group messages he wrote and in an electronic newsletter he published about the company." While passing himself off as an impartial investor and denying any payments from Green Oasis, Reece had in fact been reimbursed by the company for four trips he made to Charleston, the SEC said. Also, the agency said Reece received $600 from the company to upgrade his computer and a $20,000 discount on a Green Oasis securities sale, "all of which he failed to disclose in his publications." Reece could not be reached for comment.

The SEC is seeking fines and other sanctions against Green Oasis, Carraway, O'Brien and Reece for numerous violations of securities laws.
The agency also is targeting Carraway's wife, Mary Ann, to compel her to surrender up to $806,955 in profits she has earned off the sale of the company's stock.

Business reporter John P. McDermott can be reached at 937-5572 or at jmcdermott@postandcourier.com.