Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (14798)	7/26/1998 9:47:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Jacobs in Tucson, AZ gives about 3-4 days service on raw ore brot in, others are about a week...about recently not exact for service demands of individual times and individual assay offices. As to a fast grinding and quick read thing- I bet it could be read in 24 hours. But are you talking COC procedures or just Claimers sending Dirt in. ANY COMPARISON of this to Le Doux ...is meaningless, IMHO. Regards, Chuca

To: jlallen who wrote (14798)	7/26/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

John How long does it take to do an SFA? Can anyone on the thread answer that question? You keep asking that question, but ignoring my answer to it. You know as well as I do, that doing a follow SFA is only the easiest part of what LeDoux is now doing. The detective work and science of tryig to figure out why past numbers do or dont match up to current tests and how and why they achieved these numbers is the time consuming aspect. I am sure that no one wants partial answers on this very important question. It is naive to think that ledoux will just re-run a handful of tests and then give a final decision. the answer is far too important. they will need to assay, dig into the numbers, compare and contrast them with prior numbers. then they will have to do the tests over again to make numbers that are statisticlly significant. after that is done the harder part is will be developing full scientific explanantions for everything that has happened in the past and now. then they will have to re-test to make sure that everything comes up the way expect it to again. Your presumption that they will run a handfull of assays and say "See, we were right/wrong" is not even clost to realistic, IMO. the outcome is too important to them and us for that type of flippant behavior. Mark