Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : International Automated Systems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Walters who wrote (1309)	7/26/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: Ronald Leland Daniels	Respond to of 7618

Bob, I disagree with you- Paul has tackled the whole IAS topic from a very partial and cynical perspective. He digs up a lot of dirt on IAS (which is all fine and dandy for us who really want both sides of the story), but it is clear that he has not spent more than a small fraction if his time digging up good things about IAS. His words and actions clearly portray his purpose: to bring about the extinction of IAS. It appears he is more interested in being right than in seeing DWM work. Something else needs to be made clear. IAS always extended an open invitation to ANYBODY who wanted to come and see DWM. That invitation stood on the terms of signing a nondisclosure agreement, but it has always been an open invitation. That was never good enough for Paul and a few others here. They want DWM delivered to their doorstep, on a silver platter, according to their terms or else they wont look at it. I for one have never been convinced they were in such a position that IAS needed nor wanted their approval. After all they said and did, would you go to them for help? NO WAY! Get real! I have been on this thread since its beginning. I have read all the posts. I have been a stockholder in IAS for at least 5 years. I am aware that Paul and others have made a very strong case against IAS- a case that is based on facts. I also am aware that Paul and others have been slandering and or poking fun at IAS for over 2 years on this thread. Don't treat this tread like a buffet- If you hear only the things you want to, and disregard the rest, you will most certainly be mislead. What I mean is you should consider everything Paul has said. Paul has displayed quite a lot of knowledge in this area. He has also displayed total disregard and disrespect for those who disagree with him. He has avoided opportunities to learn about what IAS calls DWM, yet still claims to be impartial. He facilitates an SEC investigation, and then says IAS should deliver DWM for him to inspect. It kind of reminds me of our dear president. You said, "He is an awesome Engineer that is trying to get investors to see both sides of the picture." Well, perhaps he is an awesome engineer, but he could care less about the side of the fence he's not on! Regards, Ron