SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (11805)7/26/1998 3:47:00 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
Hi Rob S.; About that Virtual i/O. and the Seattle business
environment...

V I/O's big mistake was deciding to wait until they were
profitable before they went public. I was a senior design
engineer there for the year up until they went bankrupt.
When I hired on, they offered me stock options, but I
took an extra $2000 per year instead. But if they had
gone public, I would have lost out big time. Going public
would have left them still in business, burning IPO cash.
And man, did that company burn cash! It was disgusting
to watch. And upper management didn't have a clue
about their market. But they treated themselves quite
well as their company slid under. The company's final
months had a cash burn reduction due to belt tightening
that the previous CEO should have instituted 2 years
before.

RIDE and the microbrewery stocks were pretty nasty
stocks, too. My guess is that AMZN follows the track,
but that cash they got from the IPO helped a lot.

Man, I couldn't believe that the "pro-forma" profit statement
didn't include interest on AMZN's big debt, cause it wasn't
in "cash". What a joke! Here's a solution for every under-
capitalized money losing compay out there to improve their
"earnings": Convert your debt to zero-coupon! No problem!
The future will take care of itself! -- I think these people have
gone completely, totally, utterly, insane, presumably due
to greed.

Oh well. Humans believe pretty much what they want to
believe, and if AMZN can fool them by ignoring their massive
interest costs, then so be it.

Question: In the "pro forma" results for AMZN, do they include
the cash income they get from all that money they have in the
bank? I imagine they don't, as it is only there due to the zero
coupon debt they took on. Anybody look it up?

-- Carl