Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Compact Connection (TSIG) - The next CDNW? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: Steve Lin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574

Krive, Gicone, Joll et al Your last message shows that your are getting desperate and are using scare tactic outright. At least your earlier posts were well thought out. First, if you are being sued by someone and I pay you for the concept and the existing customer database, your sues will have nothing to do with me. TSIG was not part of DPE when these issues, if true, were taking place. Nor is TSIG responsible in any shape or form for the past dealing of CCI. You are beginning to underestimate the common sense and the intelligence of the people on this board. Second, you are still not furnishing us with any solid information. You keep sending us some letters which you know very well are not verifiable. "I've know of two judgements against CCI" I'll tell you about the judgements against CCI. People can make up their own minds: 1. docket #95c5179, Federal Express, $18,804, 12/11/1995. 2. docket #95c5882, Airborne Freight, $26,695, 10/11/1996. 3. docket #94344917, IRS, $ 539, 5/19/1994. 4. docket #9440554, St of Ca, $2,156, 6/15/1994. 5. docket #970464468, St. of Ca, $ 13,570, 9/22/1997. 6. docket #980168536, St. of Ca, $ 4,294, 3/27/1998. None of it looks like judgements won in favor of dealers. All these are mostly civil suits and tax liens which are not unusual for a on-going business. Now, until you supply some shred of evidence, solid detailed information which we could verify, I will think you a sophisticated basher who wants get in on the stock cheap. Maybe you got burned by Darrell Piercy and are bitter that TSIG will now make all the money and you are getting the short end of it. You know what, it's still cheap, VERY CHEAP, at this price. Why don't you just get in without any shananigans like the rest of us. Anyway, just my opinion.....poisontaster p.s. : say hi to Delia for me.

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Respond to of 1574

Krive, You're some piece of work. Logic seems to fail you as you put this diatribe together. Take note of just one of the idiotic aspects of your illogical attempt to bash TSIG under this veiled attempt to straighten things out with a company TSIG has nothing to do with. I or my attorney* may have no choice but to contact CCI's new owners for help in resolving some or all of these problems.* If you have an attorney, you've gotta know that you stop all communications with whoever injured you and the attorney is the exclusive contact. Not one, ah say not one attorney alive would deal with you as a client and watch you continue to pursue the offending party. Give us a break. If you're attempting a creative writing exercise, go someplace else where maybe the audience is as stupid as you are and will give you at least a little credibility.

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: Lane Hall-Witt	Respond to of 1574

Just a couple of quick points, as I won't bore you by repeating my basic position, which remains unchanged from my Post #344: 1. You ask: "If this is such an upstanding company, why aren't they trying to settle these issues?" I'll simply reiterate that TSIG is under no obligation to settle these issues with you or any other CCI dealers. This is due to the nature of the agreement that TSIG and CCI are forging. In your Post #355, you note, "Several dealers have calls into TSIG, and they have been most responsive, but to date refuse to take responsibility for what has happened to CCI dealers." Again, TSIG need do nothing more than refer you to Mr. Piercy's new company and hang up the phone. That they are trying in any way to do more than that suggests that they are being quite generous with you. 2. Please don't cloud the discussion by suggesting that the dealers in some way should or might retain "ownership" of the customer base. In the strictest sense, this "ownership" is simply a matter of assuming the obligation to fulfill orders placed using the MusicCard. Dealers never were placing themselves in the position to do that; if they were fulfillment agencies, they would have been competing against CCI, not working with it. TSIG's "ownership" of the customer base is, at its core, an agreement to honor the MusicCard. I certainly do respect the effort that dealers typically put into their work, and I appreciate how important the dealers have been to CCI and will be to TSIG. However, this effort cannot underpin an enforceable argument that the dealers are somehow entitled to "ownership" of the customer base. TSIG is in no legal danger of losing its exclusive access to this customer base.

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 7:34:00 PM
From: TOPFUEL	Respond to of 1574

HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO we acquired the assets of CCI please take your garbage elsewhere we at TSIG have nothing to do with your problems you can post all you want here but your problems will not get fixed through us at TSIG ....

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 7:48:00 PM
From: TOPFUEL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574

HMMM goto MTEI thread now you will see an example between a MERGER and our TSIG acquiring . MTEI is stuck with ICVI problems now because they merged with ICVI . Now we acquire the assets of CCI we have no problems because we only bought the assets of the company big differnce... David

To: Krive who wrote (356)	7/26/1998 8:51:00 PM
From: Joll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574

Dear Krive, My list of former dealers seems to get longer every day; well, "misery loves company." From the documents you've included, it looks like you received the "CCI Two-Step" just like I did. Like you, it took me nearly six months to realize that--despite his promises--Darrel had no intention of filling my customers orders. It's taken a year for me to realize that he will never willingly return my money. He never out-and-out tells anyone to go to Hell, he just keeps making promises of payment. He agreed to pay me in three installments. That was in October. He did it again: that was December. Then again in March, June, and July. The mind truly cannot understand such a brooding duplicity and, for all their tarnished reputations, most businessmen keep their word. That is why the truly slippery seem to have such longevity. We expect that the contracts we sign will be honored; we expect compensation if they are not. How will Mr. Piercy's involvement in the new company affect TSIG? The old adage "If you lie with dogs, you get fleas" comes immediately to mind.