To: Rich_1 who wrote (50274 ) 7/26/1998 6:51:00 PM From: Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
Uh... Rich say again?? GRNO gave me $20,000 in stock discounts?? That statement alone shows you don't know crap about what you're talking about. But then again you listen to reporters don't you? I bet you actually believe we used Sarin Gas in Laos and Vietnam. And I also bet you actually believe that was a Milk factory, and not a biological weapons plant, that we bombed in Baghdad. But that shouldn't surprise me, since you were provided the evidence that RMIL was misrepresenting itself to the public, yet you ignored that. And you can hardly call a company with no assets an "investment". As I've stated before, it is now just a "stock play" based upon an alledged massive short position. I have CONSISTENTLY told you folks that there is no compelling reason to sell your stock I have also suggested that you all quit whining and decide to take the actions necessary to, once and for all, remove all doubt that their is a short position in RMIL. And if there isn't then have some guts and get some answers, or better yet take appropriate action. I did not "bash" your stock out of my imagination. My evidence was the lack of accurate information coming from the company. Having just been through a similiar situation myself with GRNO, I felt compelled (lord knows why) to call Riley and Pugs on the carpet and prevent others from getting hurt. I failed in that. But no one can say I didn't try. And Rich, I do not think I'm beyond the law. That is quite inaccurate to say I believe that. However, you should take a look at a former NYPD officer and apply that statement there. There are more ways of inadvertantly breaking Securities law than you can shake a stick at. And I can guarantee you that any active participant on the internet chat boards has likely broken more than one of them in their lives. Regards, Ron