Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (50276)	7/26/1998 6:13:00 PM
From: bmart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, If I may , I would like to clear-up a fuzzy matter or two I have encountered reading this board. First-off, please make mental note of these names: -----"C. Alexis International-Michael Zapara(74900 Hwy. 111 Suite 123 Indian Wells, Ca 92210)(Jim Grant)(Harry Hanna)(Ed Brody)(Jim Bradley) 1/2/97 Alexis- San Diego (619)773-9227 4/8/97 Alexis (760)773-9227"------- Now we take a gander at the ASTG thread where it was Pug's who found the relationship between Lanza and Mork: --------"To: NCKEV (233 ) From: Christopher J. Plachta Friday, Nov 8 1996 11:37AM ET Reply #234 of 3191 Has anyone else received a call from Jim Grant of "The Financial Internet Group?" He claims that they were hired by Xecom for investor relations. He is calling all Xecom shareholders and asking them to get their shares delivered so the market makers can stop using them to short sell. I don't know much about short selling, but he claims that if you don't physically have your shares then they can be used by shorters. I also spoke with a guy named Jim Bradlee (also from the Financial Internet Group) for a while about the financial situation for Xecom. He claims that Sprint says there are currently 11,000 lines in service and they project to have 20,000 - 25,000 by the end of the year due to increased marketing and sales activities. He also claims that Xecom will make an average of $35/month for each line in service. Bottom line, he says that we can expect positive earnings for the next quarter and projects great earnings for 1997. These guys were hired by Xecom and given 400,000 shares of stock for their services, so they obviously have a vested interest in the stock doing well. Although I think this whole situation is really weird and very shady, I can't help but be encouraged about the projected income numbers. I'd like to think that these guys aren't just calling people and lying to them. What do you folks make of this? Personally, I would feel a little vulnerable if I had my shares at home. What if Lanza decides to dump 1,000,000 shares once all of the shareholders have gotten there shares delivered? I don't know what the hell is going on..... If anybody wants to contact these guys at the Financial Internet Group, their number is 1-888-770-7133. You'll all probably be hearing from them soon anyway. Chris"--------- -----"To: Nicko (1544 ) (Trial Member) From: Evan Sterling Wednesday, Mar 4 1998 4:24PM ET Reply #1545 of 3191 nicko. Where did you get your information about Xecom? I also noticed you have never posted before. Looks like you became a member of this thread today! Sounds a little suspicious to me. I noticed you posted on another company that is located in Palm Springs, California. Looks like their investor relations person is Ed Brody. Didn't Ed work for Financial Internet Group at one time? Your bashing that company to. If I didn't know better, I think that you have a thorn in your side because things aren't going well for you! I bet money your one of those guys who has a "hard on" for Lanza and everybody else who has been a road block for you! Move on buddy, your a loser in this game!!!!!! There isn't enough dirt in this world to keep Lanza down! Brody either!"-------- So , as you can see, we can find three names associated with Alexis International and Airstar Tech. which was formerly known as XECOM. I believe Pug's was on to something when he posted the Lanza, Mork, Zapara relationship and their involvement in ASTG. On another note concerning Everen Securities and what has been posted here about them, I would like to clear something up. PFG bought a big investment firm with the idea of dealing individual stocks through their agents. It turned out to be a "dog" so like big companies are prone to do, they cut bait early and sold the "dog" to Everen Securities. To the contrary of what is being said publically on S.I., Everen didn't buy Principal (they certainly don't have that kind of money) they only bought the "dog" that Principal was trying to dump. This dog carries with it a few fleas. One of which we are very familiar with. Tee-off time is 6PM ! Good evening RBM

To: Riley G who wrote (50276)	7/26/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Y'know Riley, that was probably one of the best posts you've even made. Honestly. If there was any inside information going on, I believe it may have been from GRNO to a certain GRNO limited partner that appears to have been receiving alleged benefits for said newsletter publishing to GRNO shareholders. (Try full disclosure about your alleged activities in the future, it may save you next time.) And you know something, I can't say that aren't things I would have definitely done differently had I thought there was a problem at the time. But hindsight is 20/20 and the best one can do is learn from life's mistakes and vow not to repeat them. Unfortunately, you have yet to learn this lesson, although others with personal experience of what the SEC can do tried to warn you. The problem you have is that if you were in the right, this situation should have resolved itself by now. Think about it for a second (or more). If this company possessed the massive short position you say that it does (note that the company has publicly said or done nothing to substantiate your claim), there should be people LINING UP AT THE DOORWAY to assist them in every way possible to meet 15c2-11 compliance in order to force the squeeze. (lots of money to be made that way... :0) But RMIL has done nothing to assist you except to ask you for more money for their planned merger with one of Morgan's companies. There has been no DTC count, no shareholder's meeting... nothing, nada. And if there were something to this squeeze, Morgan and Breton would be pulling out all the stops to sell this material point to all potential merger candidates. And I would imagine for a man who traded $8 million through his accounts last year AND who holds a $400,000 position in the stock, it should be a simple manner to assist this company in complying with 15c2-11 all by his lonesome self.... But then again, maybe you're not so confident yourself are you??...<vbg> No Riley, it hasn't happened. Yet RMIL management wants you to risk all once again without the necessary diligence resources, let alone answering basic questions about the float and total outstanding shares in a public filing. But hey it's your money. And I'm truly sorry that you invested so much in this stock. That's is quite a chunk of change in anyone's book. As for your brokerage statements, only you and the SEC truly know if you fully complied with the terms of the subpoena. If you haven't then you will answer for that. Regards, Ron