Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cartaway resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1930)	7/26/1998 9:07:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Respond to of 2505

Well doesn't this fine open the door for lawsuits? I admit I haven't read the findings, but I would think so.

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1930)	7/26/1998 9:18:00 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2505

ED - excellent suggestion - They are doing that with the insider from that SW Ontario company where the insider sold his shares 11 days before the quarterly Dismal results came out and the share price droppes like a rock - He has to buy back the shares he sold at the prices he sold them at. I forget the company - The story is about 2-3 weeks old. Why have the retribution to the Securities commissions??? They were not scammed - In a court of law If you defrauded me and I won a suit - you would have to pay me back the amount of the fraud and likely pay fines on top of that. - Why not the same here. It is a pathetic slap on the wrist - I will not read the article in the globe until tomorrow if it was in yesterday's paper - It is at work