Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor vs. Raging Bull Message Boards -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Seth L. who wrote (8)	7/27/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Mr.Manners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46

No BS on my posts. Post where you find it. You have specific questions? Ask'em.. I don't know the two you mention in your post - so no comment.

To: Seth L. who wrote (8)	7/27/1998 11:38:00 PM
From: L. Michael	Respond to of 46

My vote unfair reinstate...or at least refund. You shouldn't be vague in the rules and be allowed to take money that easily. I cant belive no one from administration will even comment. I thought i read in a WSJ online article about ragingbull that SI did not feel threatened by RBull. It sure doesn't seem that way judging by the mass suspensions. L__L

To: Seth L. who wrote (8)	7/27/1998 11:51:00 PM
From: Larrie Woods	Respond to of 46

Seth, your right on. As was said on another thread: "SI" types came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up. -Pastor Martin Niemoeller I also vote for reinstatement, SI very criminal and unfair. Hope none will bash me for borrowing a post from one of the banned. Larrie