Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: craig crawford who wrote (61292)	7/28/1998 8:44:00 AM
From: Darren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Lest you forget, Kurlack originally got you out of INTC at 95 and it hasn't been back since. If Kurlack stays cautious/bearish on INTC and it breaks out to new highs I would consider him wrong. No, but he was happy to get you out at 70 after the precipitous drop from 95...and now he will be happy to get you back in at 95...

To: craig crawford who wrote (61292)	7/28/1998 9:37:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Craig, >>>I think the point is that Kurlack has basically tried to keep you away from stocks like INTC/MU for a while now, and they have done little to nothing. <<< Or is it that the tail was wagging the dog? Meaning he is so influential that he is in part the cause of the stock not doing anything. Maybe, now, Craig Barrett is going to try and do something to keep the Kurlaks from depressing the stock. Kurlak may have been taking advantage of Intel due to Andy Grove's personality (whatever that means and whatever that did to prevent Intel from taking the initiatives away from the Kurlak types). Regards, Mary