Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Forest Gump	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

blewaHorse, you just signed up... What other personalities do you use on SI. You guys are so transparent....

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: MARK C.	Respond to of 11684

Well your name suits you since the only thing to come out of your mouth is horse excrement

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: LionHeart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

"no finance company will extend any credit to a company they can't trust to keep a lid on finance covenants" Never heard of that one, what is the name of the finance company? "Sambino Brothers (I Break you legs if not paid at 25%)??" LH

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: BRANDYBGOOD	Respond to of 11684

What provsions are they violating, and who devised them? Brandy

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: eric deaver	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

Bluehorse: <<it is very common for lenders to require that INDEPENDENT surveys be done on energy producing properties.>> INDEPENDENT means not affiliated with the ENERGY company. Also, just because two companies have worked together (yet financially separate) on two distinct phases of the same project in the past, does not by any means suggest they are affiliated. Also, before you start throwing allegations around again, let us know exactly the identity of the supposed lenders to which you are referring and how exactly you would have access to MTEI's specific lending provisions. Or are you just SPECULATING. If you are SPECULATING then you should say so or your statements may be considered misleading at a minimum. for instance this one: <<...but MTEI should NOT have made this public by covenants of a financing agreement with local sources...>> Speculation or a statement of fact for which you can provide the specific references to MTEI's terms (if there are any lenders that is)? Eric (sound like more of the same to me)

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: DG Cruise	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

Maybe, just maybe, financing is already in place.. Who knows

To: blueHorse who wrote (6492)	7/28/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Fred Ragan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

<<<point is this... mtei has technically violated certain provisions to gain access to the capital required to develop their properties... if the lenders so desire they can withdraw from negotiations and leave mtei without the much needed capital to develop mineral deposits... it is very common for lenders to require that INDEPENDENT surveys be done on energy producing properties.... mtei may have tainted the waters of independence by announcing to the world who is doing the surveys... no finance company will extend any credit to a company they can't trust to keep a lid on finance covenants >>> blue, I think you are a fraud. You would have to have access to MTEI's financial documents to make this assertion. Secondly you have misinterpreted INDEPENDENT to mean independent from each other instead of correctly, independent from MTEI. And "may have tainted", that says you haven't read the documents. And "keep a lid on", what in the world could that mean? Interesting collection of misinformation and innuendo. Anyone see an agenda?