Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (54810)	7/28/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: jbn3	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 176388

DELL price can anyone explain what happened to the DELL price? At about 15 minutes to closing, I showed it up about 1/2, then 15 minutes later it closed down 2+, near its low for the day???? Was that window dressing, or were there some large pieces moved to do that? regards, 3.

To: jim kelley who wrote (54810)	7/28/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 176388

Jim, Starr is threatening to prosecute those who won't testify. The choice is theirs. If he didn't have indictable evidence, then why is everyone trying to cut deals with him? Why is everyone in denial about this? Why is everyone attacking Starr? Starr isn't the one that has lapses of judgement, integrity, ethics, and respect for the rule of law. I wouldn't debate you about Congressional Members. I agree about the degree of bad apples there too. So what you're saying is that we shouldn't ever prosecute offenses? Or just certain offenses? Well which ones? Should we just start over and throw out all of the laws that aren't "serious" crimes? Maybe only politicians should be exempt from the laws? As for Miss Lewinsky, Mr. Starr must have something on her. Why else would she need a deal? The truth shall set you free. Well apparently it will, thanks to immunity from prosecution for perjury. LoD LoD