Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Heidi who wrote (50525)	7/28/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Respond to of 61433

Heidi,, **OT** We've never had a president with integrity... This one is just being investigated more than his predecessors... And you know what. I only get's worse from here. OG

To: Heidi who wrote (50525)	7/28/1998 7:32:00 PM
From: Darren	Respond to of 61433

......and this would not be an issue if we had a President with just a byte of integrity. That wasn't on the application. But I don't buy the integrity argument. Reagen had no integrity (Iran-Contra) if following the law is your control. Bush? Director of the CIA? I don't think so? How about Kennedy -- Operation Mongoose, Bay of Pigs, Marilyn Monroe. Johnson? No way. Maybe, just maybe, Jimmy Carter. And look what that got us. Oh, and how could I forget Nixon? Enough said. I think it could be argued that you can't make the decisions a President has to make and have integrity. You can keep your zipper closed, but there is precedent for this type of behavior, so what are we going to do? PUNT?