Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mcmadden who wrote (1379)	7/29/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1539

Milt, welcome to the ipmcf thread. As Richard says over and over on the MXAM thread, the more shareholders post, the more we all learn, and stronger for it. Even if someone posts misleading or bad info, I feel that there are enought threaders on this and ipmcf thread that have the insight and experience to scope it out. Nothing wrong with any threader asking us to take a path, just so Richard and the other well knowned knowledgable pro-IPM are here to examine it. And if bad advice or off the wall, lets simply say so and thank them for helping us see paths and stuff we want to advoid. Important that Charles and Rob and Paunch don't spend time on wild goose chases, so it would be better for others to accept these new ideas and suggesting and look for strengths and weaknesses. On the ipmcf thread, I posted a post along these thoughts. www2.techstocks.com Also, to contact ipmcf shareholders that gave up on the ipmcf thread when ipmcf went to 0.01, maby they are on other threads and are not aware of whats happening. How can we "broadcast" a message. We could as SI management if a note could be placed on the home page, and it wouldn't take but one other thread reader to see and post on the other thread. Also, who has accss to that Yahoo place that could spread the word to get the attention of unaware ipmcf shareholders. Doug

To: mcmadden who wrote (1379)	7/29/1998 12:25:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1539

Milt, forgot to touch on your comment about the current IPM management. Contact made with John Yellich and maby Alan Doyle. I'am not in the loop, I don't know stuff. But my understanding that with the time constrants on this activity, the success may depend on these peoples help. To not access them from the beginning, in my option, would be too risky. These guys dealing with them are capabile to know if the dealing with them will help us. And even if mistakes were made in the past, just so their help is now helpful, we need their help. I do not know whos to blame, but if thru any legal and moral means we get ipmcf upright, then lets be thankful and lets be careful now and not simple angry. Once again, these three guys are doing all the work, so lets not hinder them. I do agree strongly, that IPM management should not only listen to us, BUT IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE TALK TO US ON THE OFFICIAL IPM.COM WEB PAGE. Doug

To: mcmadden who wrote (1379)	7/29/1998 12:37:00 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 1539

To: John Yellich and Alan Doyle, From: Doug A K If you'r helping in this shareholders activity to pay off the chapter 11 debt plan so the dirt can remain with the shareholders, then there are shareholders that want to join in, but will not until they hear from the IPM Company. No time for a postal letter thru the mail, it has to be done now at the IPM.COM web site. This could be a deciding factor in the success or not. Thanks Doug