Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mcmadden who wrote (1393)	7/29/1998 4:51:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1539

Milt, I feel the same as you, concerned and anxious to understand. I am out of the loop, but it was identified today that it looked like Charles+Robert+Paunch and John Cathcart caused some confusion as to where shareholders should report their numbers to. I reported to them both. I have to admit that I confused here: The law suit that Ally Maddox identified with John Cathcart. Is this still in progress, or has John Cathcart switched over to helping the shareholders get control of the dirt? Is he doing both. Hi Ally. Please please help me understand. Please do a little spokesperson activity for John on this thread. Boy, things were much more simplier when I thought it was a done deal that IPM was going going g o n e. But looks like it fell 99% to the bottom of the clif, but a rope was throwned just in time to lasso it and stop it from a crash and burn. But now its like a bunge cord, up and back down and up ... yoyoing emotionally, 98% to crash, back up to 82% safety, back down.... Maby the ipc.com web site has no info because the management's lawers told them "anything you say can and will be used against you". Lets give immunity to any bad guys that can help us. As Chuca once said "time and await", meaning time will pass, and judgement day will await us all, and all will be knowned and deal accordingly to the rules of good and bad, right and wrong. I do remember, it was yesterdays post from Charles or Robert or Paunch that identified John Yellich as being a good man, not part of the past problem. He was simply caught inside the mess and others or other things prevented him from doing the job he was and is able to accomplish. Doug