SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Compact Connection (TSIG) - The next CDNW? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Herbert P. Couch who wrote (723)7/29/1998 6:53:00 AM
From: TOPFUEL  Respond to of 1574
 
Very well said Herbert thats why we at TSIG got this great deal on CCI to ACQUIRE THE ASSETS CHEAP and another thing my friend YOUR PROBLEMS ARE NOT OURS ..If you notice the word acquire not MERGER . and by the way WE ARE USING CCI name on the cards TSIG is handleing the rest.. I bet your the first person that signs up as a new distributer under TSIG management your just pissed the site might be up quicker than you thought and you did'nt get your .18 shares when they where availible.ANd now you bring us this garbage that has nothing nota thing to do with us. go take a maalox buddy your filling the room with to much BS and I am having trouble breatheing because the ship is to high from you and your lowlife friends that couldnt get your cheap shares. Funny thing you post first thing in the mourning as well tell me your not trying to get cheapshares

David



To: Herbert P. Couch who wrote (723)7/29/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: Steve Lin  Respond to of 1574
 
Dear Herbert,

If you like to contact me and send me the documentations to proof your case, please feel free to do so. Icq 4069311 or poisontaster@yahoo.com.

Please don't bash the stock. We have yet
to find out whether you have a legal basis to sue even Darrell Piercy. We definitely don't think you have any legal ground to sue TSIG.

Until we get all the dealers documentation, we don't know how many disgruntled dealers are there exactly. But probably between 8 (according to Gordon) and 15 (according to Mr. Rogu.

George had mentioned to us that the district attorney has told him to
forget about suing Darrell Piercy. We have the right to wonder why.
Because what he allegedly did seem to be extremely blatant. I find it difficult to attribute that to just "his connections" in Irvine.

So once again please don't bash the stock.
I welcome your proof. And we know why you feel you need to do this,
you said it youself: "if I can't get my money back plus a profit, I am going to cost them money." If you have such a strong case against DP, you probably don't need to resort to this long shot.

respectfully....poisontaster