Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donald sew who wrote (22624)	7/29/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Donald, The more people that call for a crash the less likely it will happen. The bulls have pulled in their horns , and that is really a positive, but they have not pulled them way back, so my guess is kinda flat for a while , till we get more bears. Jim

To: donald sew who wrote (22624)	7/29/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: robert b furman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 94695

Thank you for a very sound unemotional summary of market activity.I have never heard so much crash crap on a set back from new highs. In an environment that has transitional earnings plateauing - you would think that record profitability which falls to the bottom line wealth of corporate america is a plague to run from. I hope my stocks that have no debt and P.E. 's of 10 can just keep on keepin on and a very nice return sometime in the next 18 months will give me a triple! BWDIK Bob P.S. haven't had direct correspondence with you but do recall you being a student of Hi/Lows.All corrections have this scenario ! In my world of tech stock ownership this is far more than a correction a long time ago.Interesting how the indexes have floated! I don' think a crash can do much more damage than bring a stock to book value.(man I hope I'm not asking for it! :-) Thanks for realism - would like your input regarding high/lows from july-oct 96 or april may 97? Bob