Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spartex who wrote (23268)	7/29/1998 6:39:00 PM
From: dwight vickers	Respond to of 42771

It's "Barton" Biggs. When this market cracks the items you mentioned will be the excuses, not the real causes. Just like inflation and oil prices were used to excuse away the 1970's. The real reason will be, as always, the end of the cycle where stocks become historically overvalued. And new investors become convinced that the market will go up forever, because they want it to. (oh--plus all those great reasons like baby boomer retirement money) Right now we are oversold enough to get a rally. But the smart money will be selling into it. As always. Dwight

To: Spartex who wrote (23268)	7/29/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: DJBEINO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42771

Quad-k & all I was at my broker this afternoon, he said that NOVL should announce NW 5 release date on Friday July 31,1998 or Monday August 3, 1998. JUST PASSING THE INFO!

To: Spartex who wrote (23268)	7/29/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Procreant	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42771

OTS: Lewinsky deal and the Market Everyone from CNNfn to QuadK is mentioning the Lewinsky deal as a contributor to latest market decline. This would imply that Mr. Clinton is somehow directly responsible for our healthy economy. He is, after all, one politician among many who could be given credit. However, I would tend to look elsewhere first when passing out credit. Strong economic policy hasn't been one of Clinton's fortes, IMO. If there is actually a criminal running the country, wouldn't it be a good thing to remove him from office? Would it effect the productivity of corporate America if he was removed? stayed? I am young and must be naive about such things. Someone please help me understand why this should be so. That Asian problems, weak corporate earnings, and potentially higher interest rates would effect the Stock Market all make sense to me. Thanks, Procreant