SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (569)8/3/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Respond to of 1722
 
IBM to Announce an Advance in Chips

By JOHN MARKOFF

August 3, 1998

IBM plans to announce on Monday that it has perfected
a significant new manufacturing process to produce
semiconductor chips that can achieve either higher
speed or significantly lower power consumption.

Known as silicon-on-insulator, or SOI, technology, the
new technique is the third major advance in
semiconductors that IBM has announced in the last year.
The company's top research executives said that the
latest advance should give IBM a lead of one to two
years in a highly competitive industry.

In September, IBM reported that it would begin using
copper to connect transistors on its chips, advancing
speed. And in June it said it would start making
silicon germanium chips, which are expected to have a
broad market soon in portable and wireless consumer
devices.

The rapid-fire string of advances
illustrates a major shift in the origins of
new technologies and the directions they
follow as they are adopted by the
computer industry. Until the 1990s, new
technologies tended to trickle down from
advanced military and high-end
corporate applications. But increasingly,
the most powerful innovations are
deployed almost immediately to the vast
market for low-cost consumer
electronics.

IBM officials said that the realization of SOI
technology vindicated a persistent investment in a
technology that for three decades had been considered
out of reach.

"This is an important strategic advantage for IBM,"
said Richard Doherty, an electrical engineer who worked
on efforts to develop the technology at Data General in
the 1970s and who is now president of Envisioneering
Inc., a computer and consumer electronics consulting
firm.

IBM engineers have found a way to embed an ultrathin
layer of insulating material just under the surface of
a silicon wafer. The insulating layer sharply reduces
the amount of electronic charge a transistor must store
each time it is turned on.

That will make it possible for IBM to increase the
speed of its chips by as much as 35 percent beginning
in the first half of next year. That is equal to the
increase in performance typically achieved in an entire
generation of chips. The company said it also planned
to apply the process in the second half of 1999 to
achieve a significant reduction in the power
requirements of chips for portable applications.

IBM executives estimated that the new process would
initially add about 10 percent to the costs of its
chip-making process, but they predicted that this could
eventually be cut in half.

The IBM process uses a machine called an ion implanter
to push oxygen molecules at great speeds so they come
to rest beneath the surface of a silicon wafer.

The secret to the breakthrough, however, turned out to
lie in an annealing, or heating, process developed by
IBM engineers. By heating the wafers in a particular
way after the oxide layer was deposited, the engineers
were able to form an almost perfect silicon layer on
the surface of the wafer. This silicon layer, only 400
or 500 atoms thick, is the key to transistors that can
switch electrical current on and off more quickly or
can consume far less energy in battery-powered devices.


One significant consequence of the latest advance is
that it will help IBM's engineers protect chip
circuitry from the troubling effect of natural
background radiation, which becomes an increasing
problem as the size of transistors shrinks with each
new generation of chips.

Background radiation can corrupt data stored in memory
chips, producing what semiconductor engineers call soft
errors. As the chip industry moves toward line widths
as fine as 0.18 microns -- about one five-hundredths of
the width of a human hair -- soft errors in data are a
growing concern.

"A number of major chip makers have simply given up on
the technology," said Bryan Lewis, a semiconductor
analyst at Dataquest, a market research firm based in
San Jose, Calif. "But this will have a dramatic impact
on the industry. In 10 years it will have taken over
half of the industry."

Not everyone believes that the technology will give IBM
a lead that proves impossible to match, however. An
Intel Corp. semiconductor researcher said that Intel
had evaluated the technology in the past and decided
that it would be a safer strategy to press ahead with
pure silicon.

Even so, he acknowledged that in low-power
applications, IBM's process could provide a real
advantage.

Related Site
Following are links to the external Web sites mentioned
in this article. These sites are not part of The New
York Times on the Web, and The Times has no control
over their content or availability. When you have
finished visiting any of these sites, you will be able
to return to this page by clicking on your Web
browser's "Back" button or icon until this page
reappears.

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company



To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (569)8/3/1998 8:15:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Respond to of 1722
 
Women and Venture Capital Are a Fine Mix at iVillage

August 3, 1998

By LISA NAPOLI

NEW YORK -- When Barry Diller hired Candice
Carpenter to start Q2, an upscale home shopping
channel for QVC Inc. in 1994, the words of wisdom he
offered, she said, ran counter to everything she had
learned about business.

"He told me, 'Anything
worth doing is worth
doing badly,"' said Ms.
Carpenter, who had
been a consumer
marketing executive for
American Express and
president of Time-Life
Video and Television.
"Getting used to
imperfection and
evolving on the fly, for
me, was the most
important takeaway."

And indeed, the notion
that flaws are necessary ingredients of a new business
prepared her for what she describes as the "wild
adolescence" of the Internet, whose full surge she
would experience a year later. After a management
change upon Diller's departure from QVC, Ms. Carpenter
also left the company and took the leap from old media
to new by creating the Web site iVillage.com with a
group of investors that included America Online.

iVillage.com began with little more than the premise
"Internet for the rest of us" and a focus on baby
boomers. After encountering its share of false starts
(like a site, "Vices and Virtues," now defunct, about
the competing forces of indulgence and health), it has
evolved into the leading women's online "community" on
the Web. It attracted more than 2 million different
visitors during June, according to the Web measurement
company Relevant Knowledge.

"Join our community of smart, compassionate, real women
today," the iVillage.com home page invites visitors,
offering an array of news, columns, advice and tips.
Most important, though, it offers ample opportunity for
women to contribute their own views through chat
sessions and message boards on topics like "Sex After
Kids" and "Anger Management."

Although the company has dealt with
turnover of personnel and a
refocusing of its mission, the one
constant has been Ms. Carpenter and
her ability to raise financing for
the enterprise. The company closed a
fourth round of venture capital
financing in May with $32.5 million
from 10 sources, bringing the total
sum raised to $67 million.

What is it that investors find attractive about an
Internet business for which profits are not yet in
sight and which bills itself amorphously in its new
television advertising campaign as "Your Home on the
Web for the Stuff that Matters"? Besides the large
women's audience and its drawing power among
advertisers, iVillage.com's lure to investors is Ms.
Carpenter herself, analysts say.

"She's a media celebrity," said Janet Stites, publisher
of Alley Cat News, a trade publication for investors.
"She's an intriguing personality. Those things are very
important when you're raising money."

Especially when the medium for which one is raising
money is untested. Particularly in the early days of
the World Wide Web, when it was perceived as a
technological oddity as much as a burgeoning mass
medium, the fact that Ms. Carpenter, 46, was not
another twenty-something Internet prodigy with no
previous business experience helped attract investors
who wanted to test the waters.

That iVillage.com shifted gears from a broader audience
and chose to focus on a demographic in demand didn't
hurt, either.

"They picked a category that's very interesting," said
Habib Kairuz, the managing director of Rho Management,
a recent investor in iVillage.com. "The trend continues
to grow very nicely." Women now make up half of all new
Internet users, as opposed to just a third two years
ago.

"The competition was not like
that in search engines," Kairuz
said. "This was a management
team that really looked at what
worked on the Internet in
establishing a new brand. They
are not looking at duplicating
other mediums by simply
putting their content on the
Web."

In fact, iVillage.com has
positioned itself as what could
be called the un-content
provider. The emphasis is more
on what visitors to the site can
contribute on the particulars of
parenthood, relationships and
workplace issues, rather than on
top-tier columnists spouting
advice and other more
traditional editorial offerings
used by established media
companies.

Even its coming series of books,
to be published by NTC
Contemporary, a division of
Tribune Co., consists of information culled from the
users of iVillage.com's first Web offering, Parent
Soup.

Along with more traditional marketing tactics, like a
television campaign, the company has hired Catheren
Woolard, a city councilwoman in Atlanta, to do
grass-roots community building, organizing volunteers
around the country to act on behalf of iVillage.com,
and introducing the site to various nonprofit women's
organizations.

This, Ms. Carpenter says, maximizes the strength of the
medium in which she dwells. "We offer the intimacy of
community with the scale of media," she said,
describing iVillage.com as "utilitarian."

Ms. Carpenter and her co-founders, Nancy Evans and
Robert Levitan -- who are also New York media veterans
-- oversee a staff of more than 200 who are scattered
across two buildings in converted loft space in
Manhattan's Silicon Alley.

Their site now attracts nearly twice the traffic of its
nearest competitor, Women.com, according to Relevant
Knowledge. Such sites deliver demographic gems to
advertisers: high-income, well-educated women.

Ms. Carpenter has tried to generate revenue from three
different sources: advertising, sponsorship of specific
areas of the site, and product sales, including in its
own online store, iBaby.

It will take not only those elements but a lot more
capital for iVillage.com to prevail, Ms. Stites said.
"Experienced management in the corporate world doesn't
translate into experienced management in the start-up
world," she said.

For her part, Ms. Carpenter said it took a "gunslinger"
to work in this industry. "In the Internet, you've had
to place bigger bets in order to win," Ms. Carpenter
said. "I would not want to be doing this without a
media background."

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company



To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (569)8/3/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1722
 
Financial Firm to Patent Idea

PATENTS

Moneymaking Math Formulas -- August 3, 1998

By TERESA RIORDAN

Imagine that Albert Einstein were alive today and
that he were just now formulating his theory of
relativity. Could
he get a patent on Emc2?

Some patent experts contend that Einstein might be able
to, thanks to a recent ruling by the federal U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington.

The case in question -- State Street Bank and Trust Co.
vs. Signature Financial Group -- had nothing to do with
physics. Rather, at issue was a patent for a
data-processing system for a so-called hub-and-spoke
mutual fund partnership in which mutual funds pool
their assets in an investment portfolio.

The appeals court's ruling has been long awaited by
financial services companies, which have resisted the
idea that innovative approaches in their industry
should be patented. Visa and Mastercard filed an amicus
brief in the case saying they were doing just fine
without patents, thank you.

But to no avail. The appeals court ruled on July 23 in
favor of Signature Financial, upholding its patent.

In its ruling, the court said, "We hold the
transformation of data, representing discrete dollar
amounts, by a machine through a series of mathematical
calculations into a final share price, constitutes a
practical application of a mathematical algorithm,
formula, or calculation, because it produces 'a useful,
concrete, and tangible result."'

Translation: If your mathematical formula has a
practical end, you can probably patent it.

"I believe this is going to cause a surge in patents
relating to financial instruments," said Peter Roberts,
chief executive of College Savings Bank of Princeton,
N.J., who in 1988 received a pioneering patent for a
computerized prepaid tuition program.

Some patent experts suggested that such an
interpretation might have allowed Michael Milken, for
example, to have patented the idea of junk bonds in the
1980s.

But the ruling may have even wider implications.

E. Robert Yoches, a partner with the law firm of
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner in
Washington, said he thought the appeals court had made
the right decision in the case. But he said the court
had gone further than expected in its ruling.

"This is very broad, very sweeping," Yoches said. "You
can probably get a patent on anything as long as it's
not purely mathematical -- as long as it produces a
concrete, tangible result."

The ruling seems to bolster software patenting
guidelines issued three years ago by the Patent and
Trademark Office, which expanded the definition of what
kinds of software are patentable.

The last time the Supreme Court ruled in this area was
in 1981, in the case of Diamond vs. Diehr. Then the
court held that three categories of matter are
unpatentable: laws of nature, natural phenomena and
abstract ideas.

Since then, the appeals court, which is the highest
patent court in the land short of the Supreme Court,
has deviated from this interpretation in a series of
rulings.

"The direction the federal circuit has been moving is
to say you can patent anything as long as it's
economically valuable," said Richard Stern, who teaches
computer patent law at George Washington University.

Stanley Amberg, a patent attorney in New York, said the
appeals court had gone too far with the State Street
ruling. "The federal circuit has crossed over a
critical line, and now holds eligible for patent
protection any computer-implemented math equation in
which the input are numbers and the output are
numbers," he said.

"Thus, if Einstein were alive and now uncovered the
Emc2 law of nature, he could effectively monopolize its
use in the design of atomic reactors, bombs, et
cetera," Amberg said. "Because, for all practical
purposes, a computer must be used to perform the
calculation of the amount of energy released."

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company



To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (569)8/3/1998 8:36:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1722
 
GM sets plan to spin off Delphi auto parts unit

TROY, Mich., Aug 3 (Reuters) - General Motors Corp.
said Monday its board of directors approved plans to make its
Delphi Automotive Systems unit an independent publicly traded
company in 1999.
In a move widely anticipated by analysts, GM said it
expects to sell 15-20 percent of the common stock of Delphi, the
world's largest automotive supplier, in an initial public
offering during the first quarter of 1999. The remainder of
Delphi's shares would be distributed to GM's shareholders in what
is expected to be a tax-free exchange.
GM outlined two possible distribution scenarios. Under a
split-off, GM said it would offer Delphi shares in exchange for
GM $1-2/3 par value -- the name of the parent company's shares --
to those GM stockholders who want to participate. GM may also
spin off Delphi shares and distribute them to GM $1-2/3
shareholders on a pro-rata basis. Another possibility is a
combination of the two scenarios.
"Either transaction would create value for holders of GM
$1-2/3 par value common stock," said GM chairman, chief executive
officer and president Jack Smith in a statement.
Current Delphi CEO J.T. Battenberg would be chairman, CEO and
president of the independent Delphi. He said the company will
honor the no-sale, no closure commitments GM made with the United
Auto Workers union last week regarding plants in Flint, Mich.,
and Dayton, Ohio.
In 1997, Delphi earned $1.2 billion, excluding special
charges and including Delco Electronics, on revenues of $31.4
billion. The approximately 200,000 people who work for Delphi
would become employees of the new company. GM will have about
400,000 workers following the separation.