SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (13391)7/29/1998 6:32:00 PM
From: Robert Graham  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42787
 
I think Kona may be referring to the inherent risk involved with naked CALLs. If you believe the market is still biased downward with more losses in the future, as I do, then I think the purchase of PUTs would be the way to go. There is so many ways to play the market, I have never found it necissary to take on the added risk of using uncovered CALLs. But what is risky to me may not be to you who may be a more risk tolerant person. This is definitely an individual choice. But many do feel that the risk with naked CALLs is not worth taking on in a trade. I think this is where Kona is coming from.

Bob Graham



To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (13391)7/29/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: Marq Spencer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
Dennis,
I agree with you. I wrote naked DELL Aug. 120s last Monday (7/20) - got 7.75 for it. Am still holding. Also have a stop set for DELL going over 119 - to buy stock to convert naked call to covered. Good luck.

- Brian.