Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (35278)	7/30/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573130

Paul, RE: "Judging by your past information from your private sources, I would not believe them." On what would you base that asumption? So far they have been right on the money. My interpretation sometimes needs to be honed, but I'm learning fast. If you had the same information you could probably do better at interpreting it but you won't so it's a mute point. Jim

To: Paul Engel who wrote (35278)	7/30/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573130

Paul, I have no data on the yields of the K6-3 or know why it will be delayed....or even how much it will be delayed, if at all. Since when is the Mendocino competition for the K6-3 anyway? I thought it was for the sub-$1000 market. The K6-3 will be more of a Pentium-II/Katmai rival. What do I think of the delay? Assuming there is one... Seems like business as usual in the chip business...delays and bugs. Intel should be commended for actually moving up the release date of the Mendocino in that sense. Also seems like a bit of urgency so let's hope Intel has all the bugs worked out unlike the Xeon. Jim