Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (1420)	7/30/1998 10:39:00 PM
From: John H. Farro	Respond to of 1539

*******OFF TOPIC********* Confidential to Richard Mazzarella: Hi Richard, Sorry to use this thread to get in touch with you but since I don't have your e-mail address I don't have any other way. Have you been following Paracelsian lately? Keith Rhodes and his fellow Board members were forced to resign last January just as it looked like they were going to bankrupt the company. Colin and Nelson Campbell led a buyout of the company and things are looking very good indeed. The company is now under competent and honest management and they are beginning to produce results. They signed a major contract with Scherer that seems to guarantee their survival and the news has been getting better since. Check this out if your interested and just keep reading the thread: Message 5145231 The company has also revamped its web site. It is actually informative. paracelsian.com The stock price has gone from about 1/8 in January up to about $1. I hope you still have some of that stock you bought when it was cheap during those desparate days. I understand if you are fed up with your previous dealings with PRLN, but it is an essentially new company under entirely new management. If you're still interested in the company and have any questions, I'll respond to them on the Paracelsian thread. ****************************************************** To everyone else on this thread-- I extend my apologies for butting in. Paracelsian is not a desert dirt, so I probably have no right being here. Please ignore this message. I will not post here again. Thank you for indulging this transgression. Robin Messing

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (1420)	7/30/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 1539

Richard & Chuca, it sounds like valid testing of Black Rock dirt has already been done. Were the results recorded in a way that if our shareholders activities results in IPM continuing, even in a maintenence mode, that these test results can be used as evidence to support our case to get back on NASDAQ ? Also, the secured IPM dirt samples John Yellich now has, would these be sent to a lab so we can obtain more proof that we have good dirt in out attempt to get back on NASDAQ. Is testing the dirt for precious metals similiar or different to a method used for extraction in production mode to make money ? ipmcf shareholders that know of the activities here, and have not yet decided if to support this with share voting power, I ask more questions to Richard and Chuca. If enought shareholders share votes and extra money invested is obtained, and all looks good for a go, and it happens that: IPM Company comes out of Chapter 11 and has rights to Black Rock for another year, and has enought money left to continue on a path to try to satisfy NASDAQ to get back on,...dirt=good...we on nasdaq. then for this case, where are these current ipmcf shareholders that (a) pledged vote and added money .10 per share (b) pledged vote but gave no money (c) no pledged vote and no gave money For (b) and (c) just hold shares and wait, and if the shareholders that go all the way and put in more money in IPM to pay off the debt, will these shareholders that put no money into IPM to clear the debt end up being "equal" to those that did ??? will 1 ipmcf share of mine, where I put in money .10 per share be worth the same ??? Doug