SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TrumpCards who wrote (5432)7/30/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Bexar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8879
 
My guess is that we will see at least a 3 day run!

Long on GLOW !!!

Real Time .285/27 1,617 up ticks all over the place...

Delay money flow looking great!



To: TrumpCards who wrote (5432)7/30/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: Chris Noel  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 8879
 
I am looking for some clarification on the PR today. The PR mentions that the government is going to get $9,000,000 or roughly 10% of projected profits. It then mentions that GLOW will get paid by getting 10% of profits over 5 years. Which is correct? Or are both? If so, where is the extra 80% going? Somebody with more knowledge of this deal let me know.

I do have a concern over the projected profits that GLOW expects to make. How much wagering dollars would the site need in order to generate $90 million in profits? At least $250 million IMO. That would translate to over $20,000,000 per month in wagers. There are no casinos up and running even close to that number. Why will this site do so much better? The most profitable casino I have seen is from CRYP and it is netting about $10,000 per day. But it has taken some time to generate traffic and confidence at the sight.

Is the $90 million projected over 5 years or one?

Thanks in advance for any response.
Chris



To: TrumpCards who wrote (5432)7/30/1998 6:16:00 PM
From: David W  Respond to of 8879
 
That's all you're gonna get, because it is another unclear press release regarding income and earnings. Just as the original $10mm was unclear (ie. net revenues translated into EPS), this is similar. Either it is sloppy or intentionally misleading.