Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john who wrote (11640)	7/31/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

johnboy, you are a changed man, and I like the new writing style, wow, capital letters, punctuation, pauses, Gl will be very impressed.

To: john who wrote (11640)	7/31/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Well be me for while and you will see that I don't deserve vilification. I look at a company's true chances and comment the geology. Believe if you will. If you are not in a position to tell then I guess you won't know if the geology rings true. When I said that NPA and Pacific Rim would not make it I was right. It was simple mining analysis 101. I went against the crowd and gained a few detractors. Similarly I feel that Winspears chances of a mine on their fissure vein system is low. I will be born out here. Gitennes has a fabulous mineral deposit which they have botched the exploration on and a bad share structure. It was difficult drilling and they persisted where they should not have. Crystallex is a good company who lost a court case. They are in a dicey situation in a country that is unfriendly to any except deep pockets who can absorb huge risk. But they have good chances still. What you choose to believe is up to you. I don't have to go into a detailed explanation of every statement I make to justify the edifice will stand. EC<:-}