Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Castilarin who wrote (11730)	7/31/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: Jambo22	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Hi George, I do know that he is a geologist; and yes, I assume that he does in fact p. Have a nice weekend all, Jambo ps. E Charters is welcomed by me here as much as anyone else. Plenty of people post on this thread that I don't like to read but I can skip over them. At the very least, he is a gentleman. And he is putting up with a shi*load of attacks. He knows a ton more than I do in the geological categories. But he doesn't own Mine, and I do, so I'm one up on him. [hehehehehe]

To: George Castilarin who wrote (11730)	7/31/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

guido the guide is apparently a pgeo. he must be one heck of an amatuer geofantasizer to write that big a report if not. Usually only geos can BS that much. You have to be taught that, it cannot be acquired. fire assays can be done on placer material if you do them on concentrates and if they are on primary samples it is unlikely that there is enough gold in qtz to throw the sample. Contamination with non free gold is usually not an issue. If grades are high enough there are other mining possibilities anyway.