Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (2408)	7/31/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: maxed	Respond to of 5206

Hey Joey. I will type real slow so you can understand the question. Were -- you -- lying -- or -- stupid -- ?

To: average joe who wrote (2408)	7/31/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: Chad Barrett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5206

AJ, My point was that if a kimberlite were to only have cheap industrial grade diamonds... but they were in abundance (lets hypothetically say 100 carats/tonne)... although it may not be a "sexxy" investment... it would still make an economic mine! Yes, we all would prefer to see huge gemstones coming from FALC. But, smaller gem quality stones can still make an economic mine... I would prefer the large gem quality stones though, and I do see your point. I believe our largest stone to date was around 1 carat. We'll have to find a zone in a pipe that can produce quite a few of those to realistically have a chance at a mine I believe... (along with a few larger stones.... which you doubt are even there...) I guess the biggest point I can make is that the "big boys" haven't walked away from FALC yet... hmmmmmmmmm... Chad