SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Gorilla Game -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank Walker who wrote (274)8/1/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: Shane M  Respond to of 387
 
I think Intel should still be considered a Gorilla because they still control the standard and where chip technology is going. They also have substantial externalities - every software vendor currently supports whatever features INTC incorporates. Kings lead their markets through superior execution (like Dell), but Gorilla's lead their market through control of the standard, in INTC's case the chip architecture.

Should some other chip company take this control, then we must question INTC 's status. For example, should AMD/Motorola/etc begin adding proprietary features to it's chips and sufficient #s of vendors support this in the software, then the situation changes. But the book teaches that this very rarely happens. Rule #1 is never attack a Gorilla unless you're already a gorilla.

Shane




To: Frank Walker who wrote (274)8/1/1998 3:47:00 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 387
 
Is Intel a "gorilla" or a "king" in the processor chip business?
Still a Gorilla and the rest are chimps, because, as shane says, Intel controls the standard