Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1766)	8/1/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Respond to of 12823

I'd like to post a CORRECTION to a previous statement I may have made in here concerning ETEL/ SUMA/ XLSW/ I am indebted to Arthur Gronbach on the ETEL Thread for pointing out this blunder. The eNet (ETEL) deal that I had referenced was NOT with Excel XLSW, as I had stated, rather it was with SUMMA FOUR (SUMA). Apologies if this has put anyone out. I attribute this error to a form of stock symbol- and acronym-induced dyslexia. datatelephony.com This negates my previous posts that had to do with said topic. What it does, however, is shed a new light on what the acquisition of SUMA by CSCO portends for ETEL, concerning their (ETEL's) contract to do development with SUMA. Anyone care to comment on this, since CSCO has considerable momentum of its own at this stage, in the VoIP space. Best Regards, Frank A. Coluccio