Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Juli who wrote (7354)	8/1/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Colin Cody	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

Juli, I posted short-term targets for ENPQ. A baseball player was the one you recall posting the glowing long-term targets for the stock. I did happen to post a followup to Madly's BUY post the day she did it when it was $.02 Ask. It ran to $0.55 Bid for a 20+ bagger. But so what? . ANMRW was a charm on P. I posted maybe a dozen medium-term BUY signals, over three years, and a like number of sell signals. Most resulted in 50% to 500% gains. If you followed and parlayed even half of those P ANMR recommendations you could be quite wealthy! . There were several negative ANMR posts at the end (beside the normal "SELL" posts throughout the period). I posted that when GE got out of their commitment to purchase $100 million of the product, that everything was different, and ANMR was not to be bought or held -- at about $2 and change. This last one, yes was a loss. I think the last buy rec was about $3+ or $4+ and that "get out" post a year later was at about $2. Of course you'll remember from the $4 recommendation it ran to $7 before dropping to the $2 level. So even that was a winner, only I didn't post to "take profits" (except to those who said they were nervous) when it was up there. I held on, because I "knew" $100 million in sales made the stock worth $15 or more. . IMTKW, was always technical play, so there were no "glowing" reports from me. The rumors you saw posted about IBM or other contracts were by other people on P. But I still have that one, I don't think I ever suggested it should be sold, and no, I'm not happy the way it turned out. So what is your point? . If your point is that the thoughts given sometimes don't pan out? Well that is right! Arrogant? Yep. On P I would arrogantly say "buy this, for a 5 bagger", I'd get panned etc. And over and over again, the predicted price would eventually, short-tern, be met. No one said you had to buy, I probably just said people were "dumb" not too! ha ha! Again so what? I don't do that any more. After a string of 10 baggers in the last two years of good activity on P* and dwindling P* membership all that is over. Back then it was enjoyable, and there was a good group of people. . If you want to use me as a contra-indicator, that's fine. Some people have said they do that. Good Luck to you if it works for you. At least I DO give an opinion, even if it is not as often as in the past. And it is usually a CLEARLY STATED ONE. You KNOW where I stand, right or wrong, I let it be known. I don't post little wishy "recommendations" and then no matter what happens come back and say "see, you shoulda listened to me". . I prefer reading someone with CONVICTIONS behind his CONCLUSIONS to someone not giving any clear direction... until after the stock has made its move. Don't you? . On changing my mind, I agree. On DCI, which I posted several BUYS and several SELLS, I think I have been as clear of where I stand when I post, at all times, and that after all it what THIS BB is supposed to be about, DCI!!!!! I mean, like clockwork, when DCI is down and just ready to reach a turning point, I'm here again on S.I. with the heads up. Let's stick to DCI, Okay? . Colin