SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Mansfield who wrote (2342)8/1/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
'If financial institutions implement contingency plans that prevent preclude use of
electronic systems, and consumers thus have to withdraw extra cash
to avoid the risk of credit card and ATM failures-for example, to
cover their holiday spending in December 1999-how much
additional liquidity will the banking system need?
______

FROM:

Testimony By Tanya Styblo Beder, Principal, Capital Market Risk
Advisors, Inc. Concerning the Progress of Financial Firms in
Managing Y2K Before the United States Senate Special Committee
on the Year 2000 Technology Problem, July 6, 1998.

home.swbell.net



To: John Mansfield who wrote (2342)8/1/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
OT - 'Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt Jr. will take
the unusual step of sending letters to the chief executives of 10,000 public
U.S. corporations in the next week urging them to file more meaningful
statements about the costs and risks they face in fixing the year 2000
computer glitch.
...

"If investors don't have information on a company's readiness, long-term
confidence can be seriously undermined," Levitt said. "Panic and
overreaction can ensue, rippling through our economy and disrupting
business at all levels."
...

washingtonpost.com



To: John Mansfield who wrote (2342)8/1/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
'Misleading investors is a form of fraud. This is why the Securities and
Exchange Commission is requiring state and local governments to
provide y2k cost assessments if they sell securities (bonds) to the
public. Some 50,000 legal entities have now been put on notice by
an agency of the U.S. government. (Of course, this new rule will not
apply to the U.S. government's T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds.)

This is going to create trouble in the earnings estimates of most
publicly traded corporations.

The game of "Y2K PR flakkery" will change on August 4, if the SEC
has its way. No more vague statements. The SEC says that
companies must disclose where they are in the code-remediation
process and how its third-party suppliers and vendors are doing.

And these reports must be in plain English!

"A company should describe its Year 2000 issues in sufficient detail
to allow investors to fully understand the challenges that it faces. We
suggest that the description be similar to that provided to a
company's board of directors -- which typically is non-technical
plain English and answers the important questions -- such as 'will we
be ready?' and 'how far along are we?' So far, most companies have
provided only a cursory description of their Year 2000 issues."

Corporate mendacity will continue, as it always does, but it will be
far more difficult to maintain. Those who lie to the SEC will face
anti-fraud sanctions. Very, very scary, let me assure you.

The public is about to be told something like the truth. Reporters will
not need my 36 questions to get the truth out of management, though
any of the 36 will help get more of the truth out of them.

There are commentators, deep into y2k denial, who dismiss the
whole problem as irrelevant. The SEC disagrees.
...

garynorth.com