Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Harold Alton who wrote (7363)	8/1/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: Eric G. Erpenbeck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

James, That is exactly the problem the overhead "NEVER" seems to be gone. We have been hoping we are through it for months. Sure we get a day here and a day there but it just keeps going and going and that is what is so frustrating. To me this is the market because this overhead directly and constantly effects the stock price and the value of our investment and that is all that really matters (while this would appear as a short term viewpoint it has been going on for a long time and the end needs to be located). I thought I recalled a post from you or Bruce awhile back showing how many shares were still in CC hands. It seemed like there were still quite a few of them. Not even sure where you were able to get that information but this would appear to be the best way to really track when this overhead will leave us. Also your sources say that we are well over the hump, can anything more specific be provided or located somewhere. Thoughts, thanks in advance, Eric

To: James Harold Alton who wrote (7363)	8/1/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Todd Miller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19331

I don't quite understand why the CC "overhead" was removed a day or two before the shareholder's meeting -- was this just fortuitous? Also, if Friday's tumble was caused by a return of this "overhead", how do you explain this 3 or 4 day respite that coincidentally occurred during the week of the shareholder's meeting? Are we sure the "overhead" was really gone at all, maybe just not able to keep up with increased buying pressure due to the anticipation surrounding the meeting? I tend to agree more with Steve that traders, rather than investors (former CC'ers or more recent DCI'ers), were responsible for Friday. I'm sure we attracted some momentum players last week and I guess next week might give us more of a clue about that old baggage "overhead"... GOOOOO DCTC!