Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

discover

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Goosmann who wrote (6878)	8/2/1998 12:28:00 AM
From: aknahow	Respond to of 17367

Goose, RobertS, aka ALBUNDYFAN, has made the following post about XOMA and other stocks. While not really worth the effort one can IMO easily see the game being played. The XOMA post should be contrasted with his Oil Industry post. Everyone can draw their own conclusions about the nature of these post. Personal Profiles Aliases Only Recent messages posted by Robert S. Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Excellent post Slider. #26856, Aug 1 1998 9:20AM XOMA. Bull or Bear? BAYER AG ANNOUNCES ESTABLISHMENT OF #6873, Aug 1 1998 8:37AM Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Does anyone have any opinions regarding the future prospects of PGO versus SLB #26571, Jul 26 1998 8:19PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? Thanks RobertK for your response regarding BPI costs but I am still interested #6755, Jul 22 1998 8:44PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? My research on the employment of BPI in the treatment of patients has not been #6722, Jul 19 1998 9:29AM XOMA. Bull or Bear? As time and circumstances permit, I will take advantage of your offer, Ellen. #6702, Jul 16 1998 6:45PM Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services The buy and hold approach should focus on selecting quality companies w #25881, Jul 16 1998 2:13PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? Upon hearing the Incyte license deal, I expected a greater reaction from the S #6699, Jul 16 1998 12:54PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? <"In your enthusiasm to find an inconsistency in George's and my statements, #6690, Jul 15 1998 2:52PM Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Interesting Article: #25799, Jul 15 1998 2:31PM Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Greetings board. #25741, Jul 14 1998 11:33PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? <I would have to agree with the possibility of bacteria evolving, bu #6682, Jul 14 1998 11:49AM XOMA. Bull or Bear? My apologies, George. My original message was of a nebulous nature. I am inter #6671, Jul 13 1998 8:11PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? << I never thought BPI bound up all endotoxin. This is dead material and i #6669, Jul 13 1998 2:45PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? Hello George. There is no denying that the BPI molecule is intriguing but it w #6657, Jul 12 1998 8:25PM XOMA. Bull or Bear? Hello Xoma followers. #6649, Jul 11 1998 10:11AM Ligand (LGND) Breakout! Greetings all. #22979, Jul 9 1998 10:33AM I don't object to negative post. I do not even object to possible game playing but I will try to expose the game if I spot it. Game is defined as pretending to be impartial or a long when one is not or a short when one is long. No problem with the hyper bears of this world nor the hyper bulls, just as I said my problem is with those who try to be too clever by half. BTW I never agreed with Tharos. What Tharos posted was just plain wrong. RobertS's head is probably too swelled up to fit up anything. An aside, when the kids were 4 and 5 they were calling one another the A word. They did not learn it at home but from reading post on the Internet.<g> We said hey don't say that! About a half an hour later they were at it again, but this time they were calling one another, "You Donut hole!

To: Robert Goosmann who wrote (6878)	8/2/1998 12:39:00 AM
From: Tharos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17367

Goose, You probably also know that George and I have welcomed many well structured arguments and well intentioned questions. In the case of RobertS it seems, to me anyway, his intent is to grab at the slightest thing, and twist it into an attempt to discredit Xoma. Think about it, a Bayer AG news release that talks about novel drugs and therapeutics to attack sepsis is somehow a discredit to Xoma? That is really a stretch. As I stated, Neuprex is a potential new and novel approach to treating sepsis and septic shock. I presume anyone taking the time to study sepsis and septic shock would know of the potential competitive products. While I feel these products are at least three years behind Xoma's Neuprex, Bayer AG is a mature organization, they would naturally be looking forward for other therapeutics, not just in sepsis, but in many other areas as well. To reason that because Bayer is looking for novel therapeutics and conclude that Xoma is left in the lurch is like saying 2+2=1. IMO. And RobertS knows it. PS..George, thanks for that vote of confidence????

Copyright/IP Policy

Advertise on SI

© 2025 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News