SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RXGOLF who wrote (23781)8/1/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: bluejeans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
off topic/same topic/more noise;)

Message 4651589



To: RXGOLF who wrote (23781)8/1/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: Russian Bear  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Same topic / off topic:

The only well-reasoned criticism of Ligand that has appeared on this thread in my recent (admittedly failing) memory is that which was offered by Richard Harmon. I found it quite valuable to reason through his perspective. It is also hard to argue with the brute force numbers that Peter Portlas has been throwing around recently (although, luckily, "past performance is no guarantee of future returns," as they say.)

The rest of the "bear case" that has been, and continues to be, presented here, I would classify as mere "noise." (A classification, by the way, that probably applies to the great majority of posts here... certainly, including this one.)

RB



To: RXGOLF who wrote (23781)8/2/1998 12:13:00 PM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 32384
 
>After a long break, I decided to see what I was missing...
>...2 were direct cuts of Dr. Niman,

Care to reference this, or are you just back to cause trouble?

--Tony