Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/1/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: cody andre	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

How about some spelling, for starters? If you think a Political Madison Avenue in the White House is the crux of all things, maybe you should lay off some TV commercials and deprogram yourself. Have a good Sabbath!

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/1/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Hey pezz, if you ever have a logical thought, stop back. JLA

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/1/1998 11:59:00 PM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

You and the other sheeple out there keep telling yourselves it's all about sex, buying into Clinton's spin, and the rest of the logical, clear thinking people, both liberal and conservative, will focus on the more important issues: compromising and corrupting our system of laws as well as the constitution. This is nothing new for the left, though. Moral relativism is the rule of the day, witness O.J. and now Clinton, unless the particular moral being questioned emanates from someone they don't like, re: conservative. You et. al. just keep going on about the sex, sex, sex,...blah, blah, blah and the rest of us will wait for Starr's report and see the sex for what it is...a footnote...to perjury, obstruction of justice, cronyism, abuse of power, and the selling of America to the highest bidder. halfscot

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/2/1998 1:40:00 AM
From: JF Quinnelly	Respond to of 13994

pez, loved your candy as a kid. How about giving us a dispenser that looks like Bill?

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/2/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Greenpeace	Respond to of 13994

Pezz, thank you for taking an interest in this discussion. For a while, I thought I was the only one left who still believes in this President. You and Mosko are affirming the key point I have been trying to communicate to all these right wing zelots. You can't take a successful President down on sex. Clinton has done the best job of any president in my life. Reagan tore this country apart and ran up our debt, and destroyed the environment. He gave us 12 years of not caring for the people. Clinton fixed all that and now they want to take him down on a "mattress tag" crime. So what if he had an affair. If it's OK with Hillary, then why do these republicans on this thread care so much? I hope you and Mosko continue to provide your insight and fight the intelectually challenged people on this thread. Peace, Greenpeace

To: pezz who wrote (71)	8/2/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I was busy this morning and did not really have a chance to respond in depth to your post. Having had a few minutes now to review it I find it laughable and typically hypocritical of Clinton partisans such as yourself that you should be looking for logical arguments or facts in your response to me. Your very first post on this thread is a snide personal attack. Your hypocrisy is stunning. At least Greenpeace and Lazarre tried to add something to the debate, albeit I heartily disagree with them. I will say this again as I've said before, if Starr has only the relationship with Lewinsky, it will be impossible to find the will to impeach Clinton (although personally I feel perjury by the President should be an impeachable offense). if on the other hand Starr has credible evidence of obstruction and subornation of perjury or other abuses of office such as might have occurred in Filegate, Travelgate, Chinagate, Whitewater, etc. then we have a different story altogether. Only time will tell what Starr has. The pundits all seem to think Starr will send up his report before the election. We'll all have to wait and see who is right. JLA