Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (1450)	8/2/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: meyer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1539

I am a lurker for over one and one half years, and a share holder for over two years. Said to myself, I will never post here because most of what's said is malicious, vindictive, or just plain crap. Most, however, is not quite accurate, because over time some very useful information has been disseminated. Currently we have several people who are trying their best to keep IPM going . These are the people I wish to address. Recent posts have mentioned 86ing IMP and starting over. This means loss of all moneys of shareholders. If you don't hold much , or any shares this sounds OK, but if your out big money , it's a bad idea. I think it's a bad idea. Recent posts mention that those doing all the footwork now should keep us lurkers up to date. Good idea, whether it be good or bad news. For example, what's happening with suit against ADOM. How are we doing with share holder list. Has Yellich, or any others from the current or former BOD offered their shares in support of the cause. If so maybe they do deserve a chance to remain on board. Are we receiving any share support from the in- stitutions. Finally, Their may be people out there that can't or won't or don't know how to use E-mail. A P.O. box address might bring in some- more support. Thanks for all your work, to those of you that are spending so much time on this, and remember what Yogi Berra said " ".