Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mosko who wrote (84)	8/1/1998 11:53:00 PM
From: Catfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Mosko, Do you believe that Starr's investigation is all about sex??? Of course, you do. Only about 4% of Starr's investigation is about the Wolinsky matter. Have you ever heard of Whitewater, or Filegate, or Travelgate? Where do you get you information, CNN????

To: Mosko who wrote (84)	8/2/1998 12:24:00 AM
From: Les H	Respond to of 13994

If I recall history correctly, Bush pardoned the principals in the scandal. This cut off the investigation from accessing these individuals. The Boland ammendment which was specifically crafted by a left-wing Congress to support a Communist regime in Nicaragua was later repealed. The Boland Amendment Passed on December 8, 1982, this amendment to the War Powers Act of 1973, states that U.S. Agencies are prohibited from providing military equipment, training or support to anyone "for the purpose of overthrowing the Government of Nicaragua." The literal purpose was to prevent any CIA funds or support to go to the Sadinista (rebels fighting against the communist Nicaraguan government). Congress felt this was necessary because the Reagan administration had pledged to support the Contras in their battle for freedom for their country. Unfortunately a very left leaning Democratic Congress prohibited the administration from continuing funding to support the Contras at a critical time. As it became evident this was a mistake, Congress repealed the Amendment and re-instituted the funding. ContraEventually the U.S. and Contra pressure resulted in democratic elections in Nicaragua. The actual wording of the Amendment was interpreted to disallow only U.S. Intelligence Agencies, thus allowing members of the staff of the NSC (which is not an Intelligence Agency of the U.S. government) to route funds to the Contras. A angry democratic Congress responded by attempting to prosecute Col. Oliver North, Adm. John Poindexter and others in a set of public hearings. North was convicted on a number of charges but finally exonerated of all but a minor infraction, Adm. John Poindextor (ret'd) was convicted of lieing to Congress.

To: Mosko who wrote (84)	8/2/1998 1:07:00 AM
From: Rick Slemmer	Respond to of 13994

So we have just spent 50 MILLION DOLLARS!!! investigating every molecule of this man so that the Republicans can point and laugh at a cum stain on a dress. That is what I call pathetic. So now it's $50 million all of a sudden. Those stonewalling Clintons can sure run up the bill, can't they? Considering the indictments, resignations, and convictions of members of Clinton's "most ethical administration (see etherzone.com )," I consider it money well spent. More so, at least, than the $45 million for 1200 people on a sightseeing junket to China. RS