Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (104)	8/2/1998 2:36:00 AM
From: Brad Bolen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

Well, Hell... I showed up hear wanting to hear reasonable debate on the issues and I get the same boring tripe I heard 20 years ago in secondary school: Class, let's learn this lesson well: If you are a very conservative person, you are a Nazi. Now, if your leanings are to the left, you are a Socialist, no, Communist!!! Now that you understand, go and change the world... Needless to say, I skipped the posts with one of those buzzwords in header. (and in case it matters, I will not respond to any posts with that kinda feeble reasoning either) Now to my question. The way I understand the word perjury, it is not just a matter of lying under oath. It must be in a context that is MATERIAL. In this context, it would have to be MATERIAL to the Paula Jones case. Since that case was thrown out, isn't the perjury thing a non issue? Wouldn't that be the reason Jones so desperately wants her case reinstated now, and the reason that obstruction of justice is the larger issue. Just curious. B.