SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kfdkfd who wrote (12554)8/2/1998 9:23:00 AM
From: ctirry  Respond to of 13949
 
The lead editorial of today's (Sunday's) NY Times is on y2k and how this problem is not being adequetaly addressed.

The Millennium Bug Looms

ear of chaos in the world's computer systems in the year 2000 may be hard for most people to
take seriously. The temptation is to assume that since technicians created the problem,
technicians can solve it. But with only 516 days until the fateful turnover, it is clear that the United
States is not moving fast enough to fix its computers or prepare for significant disruptions. Instead of
addressing a potential crisis, many leaders in business and government are complacent, declining to
act for fear of lawsuits or engaging in political fights. Their lack of attention could be crippling.

The so-called millennium bug arises from chips and software coded to mark the years with only two
digits. If not adjusted by Jan. 1, 2000, myriad systems will "roll over like the odometer on an old
Chevy," as Wired magazine put it, effectively thinking they had just jumped back to the year 1900.
No one is sure what will happen. The breakdowns could be minor, or they could disable everything
from air traffic control systems to financial networks, power grids, hospitals and home appliances.
Some economists warn of a global recession.

It makes sense to prepare for the worst. The Federal Government has made progress but is far
behind in upgrading air traffic systems, Medicare, the Pentagon and other sectors. In addition, a
petty budget dispute between the House and Senate has blocked $3 billion in emergency funds to
speed up the process. A major problem is that even if the Federal Government is in perfect shape,
its systems could become impaired by interacting with state and local governments, where potential
problems are rampant. Similarly, big businesses could fix their own systems only to have them break
down by contact with noncompliant customers, clients and suppliers at home and overseas. The
Securities and Exchange Commission is actively monitoring efforts to root out problems throughout
the financial industry, but much more needs to be done.

President Clinton has belatedly stepped up the Federal campaign to increase public awareness by
establishing a Council on Year 2000 Conversion, but he and Al Gore, the First Technophile, should
do even more. They and sympathetic members of Congress should win passage of legislation to
encourage companies to share information with one another, disclose problems to the public and
move more aggressively to correct them. At present, many businesses are afraid to act out of fear
that any corrective efforts that fell short would simply invite lawsuits charging that they knew their
systems were flawed.

If the millennium bug problem were simply a matter of software, it would be bad enough. But experts
say the most dangerous aspect of the problem is that so many systems -- from missiles to natural-gas
pipelines to hospital equipment -- rely on billions of tiny chips embedded where they would have to
be found by engineers and reprogrammed or replaced. Congress should consider tax incentives or
subsidies to encourage businesses to identify vulnerabilities and recruit professionals, including retired
people.

It may well be that all these problems can be managed. But experts recommend that employees ask
their bosses about what is being done to get ready. If the answer is that there is nothing to worry
about, it is time to start worrying. It will cost billions to fix potential problems. But that is nothing
compared to what it will cost if the fears of many experts prove correct.

It is a bit of a paradox that as more and more concern about is expressed in the media and Congress the stock of y2k companies goes lower! IMO this is about to change.



To: kfdkfd who wrote (12554)8/2/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: P. Ramamoorthy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
Kevin - you must have seen that MSFT has admitted their software are not y2k-compliant, now open to communicate with clients about glitches.

$300Million is the minimum budget allocation for many Fortune 500 companies, may be more depending upon how extensively computers are used for manufacturing. Ram