SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bmart who wrote (50541)8/2/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: rob jones  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
Pardon me, I hate to interupt,but what does any of that GARBAGE have to do with RMIL misleading investors and the SEC in their fillings and their news releases repeatedly ?

If you were a defense attorney representing a client charged with armed robery would your defense be that others have committed robbery also ?
Like most others here you go to great lengths to deny the facts. Those facts are why RMIL is no longer trading and why those who hold the stock lost money.
Would you say that Morgan and Breton are pillars of the community ?
Would you disagree with my asertion that they are scum of the earth scamsters who have defrauded thousands without an ounce of remorse ?

What you are doing is focusing on "A point" in order to remove attention from "THE point".

My motivation is that investors stop being bilked. They'll continue losing money as its a good educator but it makes my blood boil when i see the DENIAL here. Those that were bilked stand by those that bilked them. Sounds a bit like a rape victom becoming best pals with her attacker. Strange. Very strange.

By the way, how is that boat doing ? Is that refubishing coming along ok ? (g)

My buddy from the post office said they found the $10mm check and it's on the way. Really. (g)

To those of you in denial, send more tuition to RMIL at the rate of 25 cents/share. Perhaps the more you lose the more you'll value your education.



To: bmart who wrote (50541)8/2/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: bmart  Respond to of 55532
 
Please allow this post to be omnipresent as we move on to discuss certain brokerages , certain individuals , their use of S.I. and it's relevance to long shareholders in RMIL;

exchange2000.com

----- "1. Is your client short or not on OVIS?
Randall: He may or he may not!!!! (He does not want to admit the fact)

2. If he is not short, why is he upset with the runup of OVIS? Investing
is seeing our money grow! Aren't we suppose to be happy that our
investment is going UP instead of down?
Randall: We are after the management who is not telling the truth about
the outstanding shares and illegal shares given to Michael Zapara."----

----- " This was my first meeting with Zapara. I had previously worked with
Mork on some companies he took public out of China. He paid me a
consulting fee for my efforts. On the day in Question, I had no idea
what they had in mind.
Turns out Zapara had a lot of stock in OVIS. I had a lot of experience
in the brokerage business, since I had previously owned 3 Brokerage
firms. With my last firm I sat on the trading desk and knew a lot about
trading stocks. Well it turned out they wanted me to short some of the
"PIGS" that Zapara represented. At the time, OVIS was selling for about
.30 share. Mork put money into an account in Canada and wanted me to
short the "PIGS". Zapara said that OVIS was a dog and was going to zero.
He also said that if we got in trouble he would bail out Mork by
providing stock to cover the short. Any profits derived from this
venture would be divided between Mork, Zapara and me. I shorted 100,000
shares for Mork. The stock started going the wrong way. When it got to
.35, I called Zapara and told him to provide stock to cover the short.
He suddenly got amnesia and thought he could make more money by holding
on to his stock. He quit talking to me and Mork. "---( Randall Baker)

-----" The major short in AZNT is with Zapara. That happened in a rather strange
manner.
Zapara was given over 400,000 shares of S-8 stock and could not support the
stock as he said he would. The stock was recalled from Zapara legally. He
resisted but AZNT got a temporary restraining order against ZAPARA selling
any more stock. Several accounts that he had under different names and with
different Securities firms were notified by the Judge to freeze the accounts.
All of the stock and money was and still is frozen. A permanent restraining
order was issued by the courts. As far as we can tell, Zapara sold about 1/2
the position. AZNT is currently working legally to obtain the shares back
from the various accounts."-------(Randall Baker)