Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (24046)	8/3/1998 3:20:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Okay, Duncan, if you disagree with the constitutional argument in that article, can you cite court decisions which reinforce the militia interpretation? I always ask that of pro-gunners, and would be really interested to read some recent court opinions that support that interpretation of the second amendment. Anyone diagramming it as an exercise in sentence construction would see that the militia part is quite important to the meaning, however. I believe that sentences for crimes committed with guns should be quite severe. I am not sure why you think I believe otherwise. I hope you have not fallen into the trap of believing I am a liberal, because in many ways I am quite conservative. However, since most guns used by criminals are stolen in residential burglaries, I do hope you understand where the criminals get their guns at least, and see the connection. What is the reference to Switzerland in your post? It seems like something was dropped.